Inmaculada Rite
Impact in
- Developmental Neuroscience top 1%
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Neurology top 2%
- Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Papers in
-
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments 4
- Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms 4
- Barrier Structure and Function Studies 3
- Neurological disorders and treatments 2
-
- Ion Transport and Channel Regulation 2
- Ion channel regulation and function 1
- Co-authors
- José L. Venero (7 shared papers)Josefina Cano (6 shared papers)Alexandra Lepier (1 shared paper)Pratibha Tripathi (1 shared paper)Dilek Colak (1 shared paper)Magdalena Götz (1 shared paper)Annalisa Buffo (1 shared paper)Tetsuji Mori (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Inmaculada Rite
8 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Inmaculada Rite's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Developmental Neuroscience 407
- Neurology 411
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 385
- Neurology 200
- Biological Psychiatry 29
Countries citing papers authored by Inmaculada Rite
This map shows the geographic impact of Inmaculada Rite's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inmaculada Rite with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inmaculada Rite more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Inmaculada Rite
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inmaculada Rite. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inmaculada Rite. The network helps show where Inmaculada Rite may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Inmaculada Rite, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Origin and progeny of reactive gliosis: A source of multipotent cells in the injured brain Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 614 |
| 2 | 2004 | 173 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 123 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 42 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 9 |
About Inmaculada Rite
Inmaculada Rite is a scholar working on Neurology, Neurology, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 8 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (4 papers), Barrier Structure and Function Studies (3 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (2 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (2 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (407 citations), Neurology (411 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (385 citations), Neurology (200 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (29 citations). Inmaculada Rite has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include José L. Venero, Josefina Cano, Alexandra Lepier, Pratibha Tripathi, Dilek Colak, Magdalena Götz, Annalisa Buffo, Tetsuji Mori, Alberto Machado and Mayka Tomás‐Camardiel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurochemistry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Experimental Neurology, Neurobiology of Disease and Journal of Neuroscience Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.