Ingunn Hagen
- Clinical Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Communication top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- U NayarMarit F. SvindsethJanet WaskoValentina Cabral IversenRonald E. RicePetter Bae BrandtzægElisabeth StaksrudGonzalo Sánchez‐Gardey
- Topics
- Social Media and Politics (7 papers)Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers)Media Studies and Communication (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- NorwayUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Ingunn Hagen
16 papers receiving 310 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Clinical Psychology 109
- Sociology and Political Science 96
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 81
- Communication 79
- Social Psychology 47
Countries citing papers authored by Ingunn Hagen
This map shows the geographic impact of Ingunn Hagen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingunn Hagen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingunn Hagen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ingunn Hagen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingunn Hagen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingunn Hagen. The network helps show where Ingunn Hagen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ingunn Hagen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ingunn Hagen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ingunn Hagen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ingunn Hagen. Ingunn Hagen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 87 | |
| 8 | 81 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | Social Connectivity, Multitasking, and Social Control: U.S./Norwegian College Students Use of Internet and Mobile Phones | 2 |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | Consuming audiences? : production and reception in media research | 57 |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 25 |
About Ingunn Hagen
Ingunn Hagen is a scholar working on Communication, Social Psychology and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (7 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers) and Media Studies and Communication (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (79 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (33 citations) and Clinical Psychology (109 citations). Ingunn Hagen has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include U Nayar, Marit F. Svindseth, Janet Wasko, Valentina Cabral Iversen, Ronald E. Rice, Petter Bae Brandtzæg, Elisabeth Staksrud, Gonzalo Sánchez‐Gardey and Juan Miguel Rey Pino. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, American Behavioral Scientist and Frontiers in Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.