Ingrid Schermuly
- Physiology top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Neurology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Andreas FellgiebelPeter StoeterIgor YakushevMatthias J. MüllerArmin ScheurichAlexander GerhardIsabel KellerCarsten Weibrich
- Topics
- Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (10 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Ingrid Schermuly
18 papers receiving 594 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Physiology 232
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 207
- Cognitive Neuroscience 189
- Psychiatry and Mental health 137
- Neurology 97
Countries citing papers authored by Ingrid Schermuly
This map shows the geographic impact of Ingrid Schermuly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingrid Schermuly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingrid Schermuly more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ingrid Schermuly
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingrid Schermuly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingrid Schermuly. The network helps show where Ingrid Schermuly may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ingrid Schermuly
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ingrid Schermuly. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ingrid Schermuly based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ingrid Schermuly. Ingrid Schermuly is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | 22 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 37 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 43 | |
| 10 | 53 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 72 | |
| 15 | 58 | |
| 16 | 50 | |
| 17 | 76 | |
| 18 | 17 |
About Ingrid Schermuly
Ingrid Schermuly is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 18 papers that have together received 603 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (189 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (137 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (207 citations). Ingrid Schermuly has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Fellgiebel, Peter Stoeter, Igor Yakushev, Matthias J. Müller, Armin Scheurich, Alexander Gerhard, Isabel Keller, Carsten Weibrich, Michael J. Müller and Michael Beck. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry and Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.