Ingemar Nilsson

31 papers receiving 839 citations

Peers

Ingemar Nilsson
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 214
  • Organic Chemistry 300
  • Hematology 83
  • Molecular Biology 463
  • Spectroscopy 99
Replace Bing‐Yan Zhu with:
Bing‐Yan Zhu China
F. Raymond Salemme United States
Gavin A. Whitlock United Kingdom
Chaya Duraiswami United States
Stéphane Bourg France
Jean M. Severin United States
Henry W. Pauls United States
Matthew J. Sykes Australia
Istvan Enyedy United States
Benito Muñoz United States
Ingemar Nilsson relative to Bing‐Yan Zhu China Bing‐Yan Zhu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Bing‐Yan Zhu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ingemar Nilsson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ingemar Nilsson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingemar Nilsson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingemar Nilsson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ingemar Nilsson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingemar Nilsson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingemar Nilsson. The network helps show where Ingemar Nilsson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ingemar Nilsson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ingemar Nilsson Line = papers co-authored together Ingemar Nilsson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201527
2 201335
3 20122
4 20127
5 20099
6 200825
7 200515
8 200499
9 200322
10 200322
11 20029
12 200215
13 200244
14 200123
15 200033
16 200023
17 199012
18 19896
19 198511
20 19671

About Ingemar Nilsson

Ingemar Nilsson is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Organic Chemistry, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology and Hematology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 874 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (11 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (8 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (7 papers), Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions (5 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (4 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (3 papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (3 papers) and Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (214 citations), Organic Chemistry (300 citations), Hematology (83 citations), Molecular Biology (463 citations) and Spectroscopy (99 citations). Ingemar Nilsson has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ulf Ryde, Pär Söderhjelm, Stephen Hanessian, Samuel Genheden, Éric Therrien, David Gustafsson, Hongming Chen, Ingemar Kvarnström, Thomas Antonsson and Jan-Erik Nyström. Their work appears in journals such as Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Tetrahedron Letters, Acta chemica Scandinavica/Acta chemica Scandinavica. B, Organic chemistry and biochemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. A, Physical and inorganic chemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. Series B. Organic chemistry and biochemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. Series A, Physical and inorganic chemistry, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026