Michael T. Weber

2.4k total citations
56 papers, 850 citations indexed

About

Michael T. Weber is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael T. Weber has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 850 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 12 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 9 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Michael T. Weber's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (8 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (5 papers). Michael T. Weber is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (8 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (5 papers). Michael T. Weber collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Ecuador. Michael T. Weber's co-authors include Sven Günter, Thomas Knoke, Carola Paul, Nikolay Aguirre, John M. Staatz, Bernd Stimm, Eric W. Crawford, Richard H. Bernsten, Reinhard Mosandl and Ximena Palomeque and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, The Science of The Total Environment and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Michael T. Weber

53 papers receiving 746 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael T. Weber Germany 16 321 228 145 132 131 56 850
Simoneta Negrete‐Yankelevich Mexico 13 506 1.6× 144 0.6× 121 0.8× 142 1.1× 208 1.6× 33 973
Bolier Torres Ecuador 19 340 1.1× 98 0.4× 123 0.8× 66 0.5× 83 0.6× 66 824
Vivian Ribeiro Sweden 13 479 1.5× 142 0.6× 148 1.0× 103 0.8× 294 2.2× 26 1.0k
C. Sabogal Indonesia 14 728 2.3× 267 1.2× 89 0.6× 63 0.5× 223 1.7× 60 1.0k
Luis García‐Barrios Mexico 16 474 1.5× 109 0.5× 71 0.5× 73 0.6× 145 1.1× 45 1.1k
Hubert de Foresta France 19 592 1.8× 238 1.0× 55 0.4× 101 0.8× 325 2.5× 57 1.2k
Manuel Ruíz Pérez Spain 19 767 2.4× 92 0.4× 243 1.7× 85 0.6× 145 1.1× 42 1.2k
José Lima Santos Portugal 16 333 1.0× 181 0.8× 113 0.8× 33 0.3× 219 1.7× 46 748
Laura K. Snook Italy 18 444 1.4× 282 1.2× 64 0.4× 32 0.2× 131 1.0× 51 963
Elvira Durán Mexico 13 441 1.4× 152 0.7× 96 0.7× 34 0.3× 170 1.3× 28 669

Countries citing papers authored by Michael T. Weber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael T. Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael T. Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael T. Weber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael T. Weber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael T. Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael T. Weber. The network helps show where Michael T. Weber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael T. Weber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael T. Weber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael T. Weber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael T. Weber. Michael T. Weber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Weber, Michael T., et al.. (2025). From agriculture to agroindustry: the European Union Farm to Fork policy. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics. 3 indexed citations
2.
Crespo, Patricio, et al.. (2021). Impacts of pine plantations on carbon stocks of páramo sites in southern Ecuador. Carbon Balance and Management. 16(1). 5–5. 7 indexed citations
3.
Espinosa, Carlos Iván, et al.. (2020). Natural Regeneration in the Tumbesian Dry Forest: Identification of the Drivers Affecting Abundance and Diversity. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 9786–9786. 10 indexed citations
4.
Hildebrandt, Patrick, Sven Günter, Bernd Stimm, et al.. (2019). Effects of silvicultural treatments and topography on individual tree growth in a tropical mountain forest in Ecuador. Forest Ecology and Management. 457. 117726–117726. 10 indexed citations
6.
Weber, Michael T.. (2018). Burkina Faso Jobs Diagnostic. World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks. 1 indexed citations
7.
Paul, Carola, Michael T. Weber, & Thomas Knoke. (2017). Agroforestry versus farm mosaic systems – Comparing land-use efficiency, economic returns and risks under climate change effects. The Science of The Total Environment. 587-588. 22–35. 87 indexed citations
8.
Paul, Carola, et al.. (2014). Timber-based agrisilviculture improves financial viability of hardwood plantations: a case study from Panama. Agroforestry Systems. 89(2). 217–235. 21 indexed citations
9.
Weber, Michael T., et al.. (2012). Processor's Preferences and Basic Differentiation Strategies for Potatoes, Milk, and Wheat in Switzerland. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization. 10(1). 7 indexed citations
10.
Haug, Ingeborg, Tesfaye Wubet, Michael Weiß, et al.. (2010). Species-rich but distinct arbuscular mycorrhizal communities in reforestation plots on degraded pastures and in neighboring pristine tropical mountain rain forest.. Tropical Ecology. 51(2). 125–148. 23 indexed citations
11.
Günter, Sven, et al.. (2008). Tree phenology in montane forests of southern Ecuador can be explained by precipitation, radiation and photoperiodic control. Journal of Tropical Ecology. 24(3). 247–258. 39 indexed citations
12.
Tschirley, David, et al.. (2005). Learning from the 2002/03 Food Crisis in Southern Africa: Lessons for the Current Year. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 2 indexed citations
13.
Günter, Sven, Bernd Stimm, & Michael T. Weber. (2004). Silvicultural contributions towards sustainable management and conservation of forest genetic resources in Southern Ecuador.. 6 indexed citations
14.
Tschirley, David, et al.. (2003). Enabling Small-Scale Maize Marketing and Processing to Assure Supplies of Low-Cost Staples. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 1 indexed citations
15.
Staatz, John M., et al.. (2003). Impact of the Malian Cereals Market Reform Program on Farmers. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 2 indexed citations
16.
Weber, Michael T., et al.. (2003). Temperature dependence of the impact ionization coefficients in GaAs, cubic SiC, and zinc-blende GaN. Journal of Applied Physics. 94(1). 423–430. 23 indexed citations
17.
Weber, Michael T., et al.. (2002). Theoretical Study of RF Breakdown in GaN Wurtzite and Zincblende Phase MESFETs. Journal of Computational Electronics. 1(1-2). 235–239.
18.
Tschirley, David, et al.. (1999). Successes and Challenges of Food Market Reform: Experiences from Kenya, Mozambique, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 3 indexed citations
19.
Weber, Michael T., et al.. (1988). Informing Food Security Decisions in Africa: Empirical Analysis and Policy Dialogue. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 70(5). 1044–1052. 113 indexed citations
20.
Staatz, John M., et al.. (1980). An analysis of the livestock production and marketing subsystem in the northwest province of Cameroon.. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026