Inga‐Maj Stenström

466 citations
8 papers · 325 indexed · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Inga‐Maj Stenström

8 papers receiving 293 citations

Peers

Inga‐Maj Stenström
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Animal Science and Zoology 111
  • Microbiology 37
  • Endocrinology 24
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 60
  • Aquatic Science 26
Replace Nete Bernbom with:
Nete Bernbom Denmark
Hong-Jae Lee South Korea
Jacinta M. M. Oliveira Portugal
Yogendra Prasad India
Ewa Paździor Poland
Mulyati Rahayu Indonesia
Nonghoon Choe South Korea
Mariana Rangel Pilotto Brazil
Zengfu Song China
G. Vivekanandhan India
Inga‐Maj Stenström relative to Nete Bernbom Denmark Nete Bernbom's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Nete Bernbom · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inga‐Maj Stenström

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inga‐Maj Stenström's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inga‐Maj Stenström with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inga‐Maj Stenström more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inga‐Maj Stenström

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inga‐Maj Stenström. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inga‐Maj Stenström. The network helps show where Inga‐Maj Stenström may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Inga‐Maj Stenström, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Inga‐Maj Stenström Line = papers co-authored together Inga‐Maj Stenström links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1
Detection of serum antibodies against Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae as diagnostic method in pigs.
20004
2 199521
3 199492
4 199211
5 199076
6 198545
7 198419
8 198357

About Inga‐Maj Stenström

Inga‐Maj Stenström is a scholar working on Microbiology, Animal Science and Zoology, Endocrinology, Biotechnology and Food Science, having authored 8 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial infections and disease research (3 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (3 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (2 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (2 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (2 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (1 paper), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (1 paper) and Microbial Inactivation Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (111 citations), Microbiology (37 citations), Endocrinology (24 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (60 citations) and Aquatic Science (26 citations). Inga‐Maj Stenström has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden and Kazakhstan. Frequent co-authors include G. Molin, Anders Ternström, Thomas Welander, Edward R. B. Moore, Göran Molin, Siv Ahrné, Mathias Uhlén, B. Pettersson, S. Mattsson and U. Sjögren. Their work appears in journals such as Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, Journal of Food Protection, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Journal of Applied Bacteriology and International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026