Ines Pfeffer

23 papers receiving 234 citations

Peers

Ines Pfeffer
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Applied Psychology 176
  • Social Psychology 67
  • Physiology 82
  • General Decision Sciences 5
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 35
Replace Ben Morris with:
Ben Morris United Kingdom
Natasha Carraro Canada
Marjorie Rabiau Canada
Vered Murgraff United Kingdom
Alban Jaconelli France
Adrián Paterna Spain
Kristen M. Lucibello Canada
Kaitlin M. Sheerin United States
Jeremy Adams Australia
Sarim Siddiqui United Kingdom
Ines Pfeffer relative to Ben Morris United Kingdom Ben Morris's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Ben Morris · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ines Pfeffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Pfeffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Pfeffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Pfeffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Pfeffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Pfeffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Pfeffer. The network helps show where Ines Pfeffer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Ines Pfeffer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ines Pfeffer Line = papers co-authored together Ines Pfeffer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202049
2 201737
3 201328
4 201824
5 201917
6 202014
7 201814
8 20209
9 20219
10 20237
11 20217
12 20045
13 20194
14
Initiation of physical exercise: an intervention study based on the transtheoretical model.
20083
15
Announcing preventive exercise programs: Do men and women react differently?
20122
16 20242
17 20242
18 20062
19 20132
20 20221

About Ines Pfeffer

Ines Pfeffer is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Physiology, Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 241 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (19 papers), Physical Activity and Health (8 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (7 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (3 papers), Media Influence and Health (3 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (176 citations), Social Psychology (67 citations), Physiology (82 citations), General Decision Sciences (5 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (35 citations). Ines Pfeffer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Tilo Strobach, Chris Englert, Darko Jekauc, Anett Mueller‐Alcazar, Dorothee Alfermann, Sarah Moss, Linda Gibson‐Young, Massimiliano Pastore, Sabine Würth and Mary Martinasek. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, BMC Public Health, Psychology Health & Medicine, Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology and Psychology and Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact