Inès Chouk

1.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
20 papers, 715 citations indexed

About

Inès Chouk is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Marketing and Information Systems and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Inès Chouk has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 715 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 8 papers in Marketing and 7 papers in Information Systems and Management. Recurrent topics in Inès Chouk's work include Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (7 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (6 papers) and Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (5 papers). Inès Chouk is often cited by papers focused on Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (7 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (6 papers) and Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (5 papers). Inès Chouk collaborates with scholars based in France and Canada. Inès Chouk's co-authors include Zied Mani, Jean Perrien, Sophie Rieunier, Denis Guiot, Frantz Rowe and Christine Gonzalez and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Product Innovation Management, Journal of Services Marketing and Journal of Marketing Management.

In The Last Decade

Inès Chouk

16 papers receiving 672 citations

Hit Papers

Consumer Resistance to Innovation in Services: Challenges... 2018 2026 2020 2023 2018 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Inès Chouk France 8 387 297 284 108 97 20 715
Zied Mani France 6 361 0.9× 287 1.0× 270 1.0× 107 1.0× 78 0.8× 12 669
Shasha Zhou China 13 502 1.3× 264 0.9× 255 0.9× 164 1.5× 117 1.2× 25 731
Rana Muhammad Sohail Jafar China 11 465 1.2× 295 1.0× 291 1.0× 81 0.8× 90 0.9× 25 789
Neelika Arora India 8 437 1.1× 420 1.4× 308 1.1× 78 0.7× 89 0.9× 17 767
Fulya Açikgöz United Kingdom 12 473 1.2× 287 1.0× 294 1.0× 158 1.5× 90 0.9× 30 765
Marco Hubert Denmark 13 377 1.0× 315 1.1× 417 1.5× 60 0.6× 98 1.0× 34 929
André Marchand Germany 12 598 1.5× 176 0.6× 391 1.4× 88 0.8× 86 0.9× 25 922
Crystal T. Lee China 16 484 1.3× 355 1.2× 365 1.3× 169 1.6× 136 1.4× 33 853
Dongmin Kim Canada 5 412 1.1× 354 1.2× 171 0.6× 101 0.9× 192 2.0× 17 696
Caroline Lancelot Miltgen France 13 618 1.6× 411 1.4× 260 0.9× 117 1.1× 110 1.1× 30 960

Countries citing papers authored by Inès Chouk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inès Chouk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inès Chouk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inès Chouk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inès Chouk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inès Chouk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inès Chouk. The network helps show where Inès Chouk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Inès Chouk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Inès Chouk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Inès Chouk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Inès Chouk. Inès Chouk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mani, Zied, et al.. (2023). Exploration des facteurs de résistance aux solutions de traçage numérique pendant la pandémie de la Covid-19. Systèmes d information & management. Volume 28(1). 43–85.
2.
Chouk, Inès, et al.. (2023). The Adoption of Contact-Tracing Applications and the Integration of a Health Pass. Journal of Global Information Management. 31(5). 1–23. 3 indexed citations
3.
Chouk, Inès & Zied Mani. (2022). Does the learning ability of smart products lead to user resistance?. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 66. 101706–101706. 10 indexed citations
4.
Mani, Zied & Inès Chouk. (2021). Création et destruction de la valeur perçue d’un service intelligent : application au contexte bancaire. Décisions Marketing. N° 102(2). 99–119. 1 indexed citations
5.
Mani, Zied & Inès Chouk. (2019). Impact of privacy concerns on resistance to smart services: does the ‘Big Brother effect’ matter?. Journal of Marketing Management. 35(15-16). 1460–1479. 72 indexed citations
6.
Chouk, Inès & Zied Mani. (2019). Factors for and against resistance to smart services: role of consumer lifestyle and ecosystem related variables. Journal of Services Marketing. 33(4). 449–462. 94 indexed citations
7.
Mani, Zied & Inès Chouk. (2018). Consumer Resistance to Innovation in Services: Challenges and Barriers in the Internet of Things Era. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 35(5). 780–807. 258 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Chouk, Inès, et al.. (2018). De l’empowerment à l’engagement: aidons les donneurs d’organes silencieux à parler à leurs proches. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).
9.
Chouk, Inès & Zied Mani. (2016). Les objets connectés peuvent-ils susciter une résistance de la part des consommateurs ? Une étude netnographique. Décisions Marketing. N° 84(4). 19–41. 14 indexed citations
10.
Mani, Zied & Inès Chouk. (2016). Drivers of consumers’ resistance to smart products. Journal of Marketing Management. 33(1-2). 76–97. 213 indexed citations
11.
Chouk, Inès & Zied Mani. (2016). WHY CONSUMER RESIST TO SMART PRODUCTS?. 80–80. 1 indexed citations
12.
Chouk, Inès, et al.. (2015). Promoting organ donation through the ‘intensity of discussions’ with next of kin: role of superstition, taboo of death and personality variables. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition). 30(3). 105–123. 4 indexed citations
13.
Chouk, Inès, et al.. (2015). Favoriser le don d’organes grâce à « l’intensité de la discussion » avec les proches : rôle de la superstition, du tabou de la mort et de variables de personnalité. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition). 30(3). 109–127. 5 indexed citations
14.
Chouk, Inès, et al.. (2013). Does the patient really act like a supermarket shopper? Proposal of a typology of patients' expectations towards the healthcare system. International Journal of Healthcare Management. 6(3). 142–151. 6 indexed citations
15.
Chouk, Inès, et al.. (2012). La cyber-résistance du consommateur : Quels enjeux pour les entreprises ?. Décisions Marketing. N° 68(4). 83–88. 5 indexed citations
16.
Chouk, Inès, et al.. (2009). Does the Patient Really Act Like a Supermarket Shopper? a Semiotic Typology of Patients’ Attitudes and Expectations Towards the Health-Care System and the Consumption of Medicines. ACR North American Advances. 1 indexed citations
17.
Chouk, Inès. (2005). La confiance du consommateur vis-à-vis d’un marchand Internet: proposition d’une échelle de mesure. Base Institutionnelle de Recherche de l'université Paris-Dauphine (BIRD) (University Paris-Dauphine). 10 indexed citations
18.
Chouk, Inès & Jean Perrien. (2004). Consumer Trust towards an Unfamiliar Web Merchant. Economics Papers from University Paris Dauphine. 2 indexed citations
19.
Chouk, Inès & Jean Perrien. (2004). Proposition d'un modèle conceptuel de la confiance du consommateur vis-à-vis d'un marchand électronique : une approche par le rôle des tiers. Economics Papers from University Paris Dauphine.
20.
Chouk, Inès & Jean Perrien. (2004). Les facteurs expliquant la confiance du consommateur lors d’un achat sur un site marchand : une étude exploratoire. Décisions Marketing. 35. 75–86. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026