Ida Seing
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Clinical Psychology
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Per NilsénKristina SchildmeijerCarin EricssonSarah A. BirkenChristian StåhlKerstin EkbergEllen MacEachenJanna Skagerström
- Topics
- Workplace Health and Well-being (12 papers)COVID-19 and Mental Health (7 papers)Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaExperimental Cell ResearchJournal of Affective Disorders
- Partner nations
- SwedenDenmarkUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ida Seing
35 papers receiving 525 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- General Health Professions 343
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 73
- Clinical Psychology 58
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 55
- Economics and Econometrics 51
Countries citing papers authored by Ida Seing
This map shows the geographic impact of Ida Seing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ida Seing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ida Seing more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ida Seing
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ida Seing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ida Seing. The network helps show where Ida Seing may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ida Seing
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ida Seing. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ida Seing based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ida Seing. Ida Seing is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 167 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 55 | |
| 17 | 44 | |
| 18 | 34 | |
| 19 | En möjliggörande arbetsmarknadspolitik? Arbetsförmedlingens utredning och klassificering av klienters arbetsförmåga, anställbarhet och funktionshinder | 4 |
| 20 | 47 |
About Ida Seing
Ida Seing is a scholar working on Public Administration, Research and Theory and General Health Professions, having authored 36 papers that have together received 549 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Workplace Health and Well-being (12 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (7 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (343 citations), Research and Theory (12 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (55 citations). Ida Seing has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Denmark and United States. Frequent co-authors include Per Nilsén, Kristina Schildmeijer, Carin Ericsson, Sarah A. Birken, Christian Ståhl, Kerstin Ekberg, Ellen MacEachen, Janna Skagerström, Kerstin Jacobsson and Pia H. Bülow. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Experimental Cell Research and Journal of Affective Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.