Rosemary Rushmer

1.3k total citations
43 papers, 822 citations indexed

About

Rosemary Rushmer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health Information Management and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Rosemary Rushmer has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 822 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in General Health Professions, 11 papers in Health Information Management and 11 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Rosemary Rushmer's work include Healthcare Quality and Management (11 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (8 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (8 papers). Rosemary Rushmer is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare Quality and Management (11 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (8 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (8 papers). Rosemary Rushmer collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Rosemary Rushmer's co-authors include Huw Davies, Joyce E. Wilkinson, Murray Lough, Diane Kelly, Mandy Cheetham, Peter van der Graaf, Brian Williams, Alison Powell, Jon Dowell and Gerry Humphris and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Pain and Social Science & Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Rosemary Rushmer

43 papers receiving 768 citations

Peers

Rosemary Rushmer

GHP

PHEOH

OBHRM

HIM

EMS

Jennifer Plumb United States

Wendy McGuire Canada

Vesna Bjegović-Mikanović Serbia

Brenda Poulton United Kingdom

Ragnhild Hellesø Norway

Meg Bond United Kingdom

Blossom Yen-Ju Lin Taiwan

Dana Beth Weinberg United States

Ann Dadich Australia

Margo Rowan Canada

Jennifer Plumb United States

Rosemary Rushmer

586 ×1.2

GHP

228 ×1.6

PHEOH

148 ×1.1

OBHRM

72 ×0.8

HIM

82 ×1.3

EMS

Citations per year, relative to Rosemary Rushmer Rosemary Rushmer (= 1×) peers Jennifer Plumb

Countries citing papers authored by Rosemary Rushmer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rosemary Rushmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rosemary Rushmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rosemary Rushmer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rosemary Rushmer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rosemary Rushmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rosemary Rushmer. The network helps show where Rosemary Rushmer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rosemary Rushmer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rosemary Rushmer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rosemary Rushmer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rosemary Rushmer. Rosemary Rushmer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Graaf, Peter van der, Mandy Cheetham, Amelia A. Lake, et al.. (2019). Mobilising knowledge in public health: reflections on ten years of collaborative working in Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health. Evidence & Policy. 16(4). 673–685. 6 indexed citations

Cheetham, Mandy, et al.. (2018). “It was the whole picture” a mixed methods study of successful components in an integrated wellness service in North East England. BMC Health Services Research. 18(1). 200–200. 5 indexed citations

Cheetham, Mandy, et al.. (2017). 025 PP: “A FRESH SET OF EYES?” NEGOTIATING THE REALITIES OF EMBEDDED RESEARCH IN PUBLIC HEALTH. Europe PMC (PubMed Central). bmjopen–2017. 1 indexed citations

Lake, Amelia A., Jon Warren, Alison Copeland, Rosemary Rushmer, & Clare Bambra. (2015). Developing virtual public health networks: aspiration and reality. Journal of Public Health. 38(4). fdv172–fdv172. 4 indexed citations

Kelly, Diane, et al.. (2011). Diagnosing a learning practice: the validity and reliability of a learning practice inventory. BMJ Quality & Safety. 20(3). 209–215. 2 indexed citations

Rushmer, Rosemary, et al.. (2010). Is the routine recording of primary care consultations possible … and desirable? Lessons for researchers from a consultation with multiple stakeholders. Patient Education and Counseling. 82(2). 247–253. 11 indexed citations

Bowie, Paul, et al.. (2010). Clinical audit and quality improvement – time for a rethink?. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 18(1). 42–48. 35 indexed citations

Burnett, Emma, et al.. (2009). Healthcare-associated infection and the patient experience: a qualitative study using patient interviews. Journal of Hospital Infection. 74(1). 42–47. 35 indexed citations

Powell, Alison, Rosemary Rushmer, & Huw Davies. (2009). Practitioner-led rapid cycle change. British Journal of Healthcare Management. 15(5). 218–222. 4 indexed citations

10.

Powell, Alison, Rosemary Rushmer, & Huw Davies. (2009). Effective quality improvement: BPR. British Journal of Healthcare Management. 15(4). 166–170. 21 indexed citations

11.

Themessl‐Huber, Markus, Gerry Humphris, Jon Dowell, et al.. (2008). Audio-visual recording of patient–GP consultations for research purposes: A literature review on recruiting rates and strategies. Patient Education and Counseling. 71(2). 157–168. 77 indexed citations

12.

Rushmer, Rosemary, et al.. (2008). MEASURE IT, IMPROVE IT: the Safer Patients Initiative and quality improvement in subcutaneous insulin therapy for hospital in‐patients. Diabetic Medicine. 25(8). 960–967. 23 indexed citations

13.

Kelly, Diane, et al.. (2007). Delivering feedback on learning organization characteristics – using a Learning Practice Inventory. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 13(5). 734–740. 16 indexed citations

14.

Rushmer, Rosemary. (2005). Blurred boundaries damage inter-professional working. Nurse Researcher. 12(3). 74–85. 16 indexed citations

15.

Wilkinson, Joyce E., Rosemary Rushmer, & Huw Davies. (2004). Clinical governance and the learning organization. Journal of Nursing Management. 12(2). 105–113. 33 indexed citations

16.

Rushmer, Rosemary, Diane Kelly, Murray Lough, Joyce E. Wilkinson, & Huw Davies. (2004). Introducing the Learning Practice – III. Leadership, empowerment, protected time and reflective practice as core contextual conditions. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 10(3). 399–405. 42 indexed citations

17.

Rushmer, Rosemary, Diane Kelly, Murray Lough, Joyce E. Wilkinson, & Huw Davies. (2004). Introducing the Learning Practice – II. Becoming a Learning Practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 10(3). 387–398. 38 indexed citations

18.

Rushmer, Rosemary, Diane Kelly, Murray Lough, Joyce E. Wilkinson, & Huw Davies. (2004). Introducing the Learning Practice – I. The characteristics of Learning Organizations in Primary Care. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 10(3). 375–386. 44 indexed citations

19.

Rushmer, Rosemary. (1996). Is Belbin’s shaper really TMS’s thruster‐organizer? An empirical investigation into the correspondence between the Belbin and TMS team role models. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 17(1). 20–26. 7 indexed citations

20.

Swanston, Michael T, et al.. (1993). Pain assessment with interactive computer animation. Pain. 53(3). 347–351. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact