M. H. Lewis
- Ceramics and Composites top 1%
- Advanced ceramic materials synthesis 24
- Metals and Alloys top 5%
- Mechanical Engineering top 2%
- Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties 11
- Advanced materials and composites 8
- Materials Chemistry top 5%
- Mechanics of Materials top 5%
- Metal and Thin Film Mechanics 9
-
- Aortic aneurysm repair treatments 19
- Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches 6
- Renal and Vascular Pathologies 5
-
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes 12
- Co-authors
- P. S. BellP.K.P. DrewJ. BillinghamR. DupreeMark E. SmithA. R. MoossaDamian M. BaileyGareth Morris‐Stiff
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
M. H. Lewis
98 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
- Ceramics and Composites 642
- Metals and Alloys 141
- Mechanical Engineering 790
- Materials Chemistry 903
- Mechanics of Materials 342
Countries citing papers authored by M. H. Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of M. H. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. H. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. H. Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. H. Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. H. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. H. Lewis. The network helps show where M. H. Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. H. Lewis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 58 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 35 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 5 | |
| 15 | Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms in urology patients referred for ultrasound. | 1999 | 6 |
| 16 | 1998 | 6 | |
| 17 | Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a hypertensive population. | 1996 | 25 |
| 18 | 1991 | 41 | |
| 19 | 1988 | 8 | |
| 20 | 1974 | 30 |
About M. H. Lewis
M. H. Lewis is a scholar working on Ceramics and Composites, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 99 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced ceramic materials synthesis (24 papers), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (19 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (12 papers), Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties (11 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (9 papers), Advanced materials and composites (8 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (6 papers) and Renal and Vascular Pathologies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ceramics and Composites (642 citations), Metals and Alloys (141 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (790 citations). M. H. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include P. S. Bell, P.K.P. Drew, J. Billingham, R. Dupree, Mark E. Smith, A. R. Moossa, Damian M. Bailey, Gareth Morris‐Stiff, J.W. Martin and Geoff West.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.