Huw Thomas
- Oncology top 1%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.5%
- Surgery top 5%
- Genetics top 2%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Brian P. SaundersLara LiptonOliver M. SieberIan TomlinsonMalcolm G. DunlopShirley V. HodgsonMatthew D. RutterIsis Dove‐Edwin
- Topics
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (27 papers)Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (17 papers)Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Huw Thomas
38 papers receiving 3.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Oncology 2.2k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 2.1k
- Surgery 865
- Genetics 861
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 839
Countries citing papers authored by Huw Thomas
This map shows the geographic impact of Huw Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Huw Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Huw Thomas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Huw Thomas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Huw Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Huw Thomas. The network helps show where Huw Thomas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Huw Thomas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Huw Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Huw Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Huw Thomas. Huw Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | Guidelines for the management of hereditary colorectal cancer from the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG)/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI)/United Kingdom Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG)breakdown → | 255 |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 51 | |
| 6 | Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002)breakdown → | 816 |
| 7 | 100 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 146 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 158 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 102 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 205 | |
| 16 | 147 | |
| 17 | 81 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | Genetic analysis of colorectal cancer. | 10 |
| 20 | 4 |
About Huw Thomas
Huw Thomas is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology and Surgery, having authored 39 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (27 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (17 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (2.1k citations), Oncology (2.2k citations) and Cancer Research (571 citations). Huw Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Brian P. Saunders, Lara Lipton, Oliver M. Sieber, Ian Tomlinson, Malcolm G. Dunlop, Shirley V. Hodgson, Matthew D. Rutter, Isis Dove‐Edwin, James E. East and D. Gareth Evans. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Nature Communications and Nature Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.