Carmela Di Gregorio
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.5%
- Oncology top 1%
- Surgery top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Cancer Research top 2%
- Co-authors
- Maurizio Ponz de LeònLuca RoncucciMonica PedroniLorena LosiPiero BenattiRossella FanteGiovanni PontiGiuseppina Rossi
- Topics
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (56 papers)Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (37 papers)Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (28 papers)
- Partner nations
- ItalyPortugalUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Carmela Di Gregorio
87 papers receiving 3.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.8k
- Oncology 1.8k
- Surgery 727
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 679
- Cancer Research 652
Countries citing papers authored by Carmela Di Gregorio
This map shows the geographic impact of Carmela Di Gregorio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carmela Di Gregorio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carmela Di Gregorio more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Carmela Di Gregorio
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carmela Di Gregorio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carmela Di Gregorio. The network helps show where Carmela Di Gregorio may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carmela Di Gregorio
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carmela Di Gregorio. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carmela Di Gregorio based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Carmela Di Gregorio. Carmela Di Gregorio is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 52 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 52 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | Injecção intralesional de betametasona nas estenoses benignas do esófago | 2 |
| 14 | 56 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 74 | |
| 17 | 53 | |
| 18 | 48 | |
| 19 | 51 | |
| 20 | 49 |
About Carmela Di Gregorio
Carmela Di Gregorio is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology and Cancer Research, having authored 88 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (56 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (37 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (28 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.8k citations), Oncology (1.8k citations) and Cancer Research (652 citations). Carmela Di Gregorio has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Portugal and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Maurizio Ponz de Leòn, Luca Roncucci, Monica Pedroni, Lorena Losi, Piero Benatti, Rossella Fante, Giovanni Ponti, Giuseppina Rossi, A Scarselli and Luca Reggiani Bonetti. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Gastroenterology and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.