Malcolm G. Dunlop
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.05%
- Oncology top 0.2%
- Molecular Biology top 1%
- Cancer Research top 0.2%
- Genetics top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Susan M. FarringtonAlbert TenesaHarry CampbellEvropi ΤheodoratouN D HastieRobin C. AllshireDaryll K. GreenMaureen Dempster
- Topics
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (91 papers)Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (52 papers)Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (35 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Malcolm G. Dunlop
214 papers receiving 13.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 163
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 6.4k
- Oncology 5.6k
- Molecular Biology 4.3k
- Cancer Research 3.2k
- Genetics 2.7k
Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm G. Dunlop
This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm G. Dunlop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm G. Dunlop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm G. Dunlop more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm G. Dunlop
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm G. Dunlop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm G. Dunlop. The network helps show where Malcolm G. Dunlop may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Malcolm G. Dunlop
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Malcolm G. Dunlop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Malcolm G. Dunlop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Malcolm G. Dunlop. Malcolm G. Dunlop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 28 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 62 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 53 | |
| 13 | 109 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 136 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 151 | |
| 18 | 56 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Vascular access: experience with the brachiocephalic fistula. | 45 |
About Malcolm G. Dunlop
Malcolm G. Dunlop is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cancer Research and Oncology, having authored 222 papers that have together received 13.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (91 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (52 papers) and Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (35 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (6.4k citations), Cancer Research (3.2k citations) and Oncology (5.6k citations). Malcolm G. Dunlop has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Susan M. Farrington, Albert Tenesa, Harry Campbell, Evropi Τheodoratou, N D Hastie, Robin C. Allshire, Daryll K. Green, Maureen Dempster, Alastair M. Thompson and Mary Porteous. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, New England Journal of Medicine and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.