Hugh M. Shingleton

6.4k citations
145 papers · 5.4k · h-index 38

Impact in

Papers in

Hugh M. Shingleton

141 papers receiving 4.8k citations

Peers

Hugh M. Shingleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 3.1k
  • Reproductive Medicine 1.4k
  • Epidemiology 1.4k
  • Surgery 1.2k
  • Oncology 684
Replace Mitchell Morris with:
Mitchell Morris United States
John H. Malfetano United States
Wesley Caswell Fowler United States
C. Paul Morrow United States
Frederick B. Stehman United States
J Bénda United States
M. Steven Piver United States
Joanne A. de Hullu Netherlands
Alberto Manetta United States
Jonathan S. Berek United States
Hugh M. Shingleton relative to Mitchell Morris United States Mitchell Morris's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mitchell Morris · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hugh M. Shingleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hugh M. Shingleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugh M. Shingleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugh M. Shingleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hugh M. Shingleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugh M. Shingleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugh M. Shingleton. The network helps show where Hugh M. Shingleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hugh M. Shingleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hugh M. Shingleton Line = papers co-authored together Hugh M. Shingleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 145 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995440
2 1980281
3 1981261
4 1979190
5 1989167
6 1981160
7 1980153
8 1989144
9 1985134
10 1989117
11 1989116
12 1990110
13 197997
14
Identification of histopathologic risk groups in stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.
198593
15 199893
16 199092
17 197882
18 199779
19 199477
20 199575

About Hugh M. Shingleton

Hugh M. Shingleton is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Epidemiology, Surgery and Oncology, having authored 145 papers that have together received 5.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (42 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (33 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (26 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (11 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (10 papers), Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies (10 papers), Ureteral procedures and complications (9 papers) and Genital Health and Disease (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (3.1k citations), Reproductive Medicine (1.4k citations), Epidemiology (1.4k citations), Surgery (1.2k citations) and Oncology (684 citations). Hugh M. Shingleton has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth D. Hatch, John A. Blessing, James Wilder Orr, Edward E. Partridge, Ronald David Alvarez, Seng‐Jaw Soong, Leo D. Lagasse, Vicki V. Baker, Hazel Gore and Seng Jaw Soong. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey and Journal of Surgical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact