C. William Helm

54 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

C. William Helm
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Reproductive Medicine 239
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 199
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 152
  • Surgery 475
  • Emergency Medicine 68
Replace Thomas A. Godwin with:
Thomas A. Godwin United States
Yun Hwan Kim South Korea
Vinay K. Malviya United States
S. K. Khoo Australia
Peyton T. Taylor United States
René Hornung Switzerland
Naoki Sato Japan
David G. Grenache United States
Hye Seung Han South Korea
Lea Novak United States
C. William Helm relative to Thomas A. Godwin United States Thomas A. Godwin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Thomas A. Godwin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. William Helm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. William Helm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. William Helm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. William Helm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. William Helm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. William Helm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. William Helm. The network helps show where C. William Helm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. William Helm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. William Helm Line = papers co-authored together C. William Helm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008117
2 200990
3 199472
4 198666
5 200965
6 201456
7 199456
8 200847
9 201145
10 199241
11 198538
12 198932
13 201229
14 198327
15 201125
16 199324
17 201223
18 201222
19 201422
20 200619

About C. William Helm

C. William Helm is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (15 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (12 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (9 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (7 papers), Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (5 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (5 papers), Genital Health and Disease (4 papers) and Arsenic contamination and mitigation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (239 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (199 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (152 citations), Surgery (475 citations) and Emergency Medicine (68 citations). C. William Helm has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include J. Christopher States, Nichola C. Garbett, A. Bennett Jenson, Jonathan B. Chaires, Hugh M. Shingleton, Chongkham S. Mekmaysy, Edward E. Partridge, I. W. WHIMSTER, James B. Hall and G. Stewart. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact