M. Steven Piver

8.3k citations
211 papers · 6.2k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 42

M. Steven Piver

208 papers receiving 5.9k citations

Hit Papers

FIVE CLASSES OF EXTENDED HYSTERECTOMY FOR WOMEN WITH CERV...6181975202619922009200400600

Peers

M. Steven Piver
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Reproductive Medicine 3.3k
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 2.7k
  • Oncology 1.2k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 762
  • Surgery 1.8k
Replace Philip J. DiSaia with:
Philip J. DiSaia United States
John T. Soper United States
J. Taylor Wharton United States
Costantino Mangioni Italy
Jeffrey D. Seidman United States
Howard D. Homesley United States
U. Beller Israel
George D. Malkasian United States
Michael G. Muto United States
Stefano Greggi Italy
M. Steven Piver relative to Philip J. DiSaia United States Philip J. DiSaia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Philip J. DiSaia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Steven Piver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Steven Piver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Steven Piver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Steven Piver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Steven Piver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Steven Piver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Steven Piver. The network helps show where M. Steven Piver may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Steven Piver, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Steven Piver Line = papers co-authored together M. Steven Piver links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200356
2 200010
3 200021
4 199969
5 1997123
6 199710
7 199682
8 199422
9 19929
10 199131
11 19907
12 199071
13 198918
14 1988129
15 19889
16 198838
17
Ovarian malignancies : diagnostic and therapeutic advances
19878
18
Diagnóstico precoz del cáncer de ovario
19832
19 198177
20
Incidence of subclinical metastasis in stage I and II ovarian carcinoma.
1978136

About M. Steven Piver

M. Steven Piver is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 211 papers that have together received 6.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (98 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (62 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (25 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (19 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (15 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (15 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (15 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (3.3k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (2.7k citations) and Oncology (1.2k citations). M. Steven Piver has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Joseph J. Barlow, Ronald E. Hempling, Yoshiaki Tsukada, Julian P. Smith, Felix N. Rutledge, Trudy R. Baker, Gamal H. Eltabbakh, Shashikant B. Lele, Fernando O. Recio and Leslie E. Blumenson. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026