Rachel Bright-Thomas

657 total citations
9 papers, 99 citations indexed

About

Rachel Bright-Thomas is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Cancer Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Rachel Bright-Thomas has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 99 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Surgery, 4 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 2 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in Rachel Bright-Thomas's work include Breast Implant and Reconstruction (3 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (2 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers). Rachel Bright-Thomas is often cited by papers focused on Breast Implant and Reconstruction (3 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (2 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers). Rachel Bright-Thomas collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Rachel Bright-Thomas's co-authors include Rachel Hargest, Amit Agrawal, Piyush Sarmah, Sue Down, John Winstanley, Hugh Bishop, Steven Thrush, James Harvey, D. A. Cunningham and Sophocles Lanitis and has published in prestigious journals such as BMJ, British journal of surgery and European Journal of Surgical Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Rachel Bright-Thomas

8 papers receiving 97 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Rachel Bright-Thomas United Kingdom	4	42	38	29	17	16	9	99
Debbie Hughes United Kingdom	6	32 0.8×	9 0.2×	18 0.6×	16 0.9×	5 0.3×	14	116
Kelsey Finn United States	4	34 0.8×	10 0.3×	33 1.1×	20 1.2×	7 0.4×	4	191
Marie Navratilova Czechia	4	55 1.3×	15 0.4×	17 0.6×	13 0.8×	6 0.4×	4	140
Philip Pancari United States	3	23 0.5×	33 0.9×	8 0.3×	6 0.4×	5 0.3×	6	76
O Mioduszewska Poland	6	18 0.4×	32 0.8×	20 0.7×	12 0.7×	4 0.3×	13	71
Kevin Norris United Kingdom	5	73 1.7×	15 0.4×	14 0.5×	6 0.4×	6 0.4×	11	158
Thomas Buttrick United States	5	53 1.3×	5 0.1×	23 0.8×	15 0.9×	6 0.4×	7	170
Hollie Benson United States	4	41 1.0×	16 0.4×	25 0.9×	30 1.8×	13 0.8×	4	91
Rachel Coleby United Kingdom	6	21 0.5×	5 0.1×	29 1.0×	9 0.5×	18 1.1×	9	120
Mosche Pompsch Germany	5	69 1.6×	10 0.3×	14 0.5×	25 1.5×	10 0.6×	6	141

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Bright-Thomas

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Bright-Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Bright-Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Bright-Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Bright-Thomas

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Bright-Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Bright-Thomas. The network helps show where Rachel Bright-Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Bright-Thomas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Bright-Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Bright-Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Bright-Thomas. Rachel Bright-Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Bright-Thomas, Rachel, et al.. (2015). Paget's disease of the male breast with underlying ductal carcinoma in situ ('DCIS'). Journal of Surgical Case Reports. 2015(4). rjv037–rjv037. 7 indexed citations

2.

Tasoulis, Marios Konstantinos, Sophocles Lanitis, Rachel Bright-Thomas, et al.. (2015). Adequacy of diagnostic tests and surgical management of symptomatic invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 97(8). 578–583. 3 indexed citations

3.

Harvey, James, Sue Down, Rachel Bright-Thomas, John Winstanley, & Hugh Bishop. (2013). Breast Disease Management: A Multidisciplinary Manual. 3 indexed citations

4.

Sarmah, Piyush, et al.. (2012). A pure dermal sling for implant reconstruction after mastectomy in the generous breast. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 94(5). 364–364. 3 indexed citations

5.

Sarmah, Piyush, et al.. (2012). A pure dermal sling for implant reconstruction after mastectomy in the generous breast. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 94(5). 364–365. 2 indexed citations

6.

Bright-Thomas, Rachel, et al.. (2010). Pseudomonal breast infection. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 92(3). e20–e22. 4 indexed citations

7.

Bright-Thomas, Rachel. (2006). Keeping abreast of change. BMJ. 332(7534). s23.2–s24.

8.

Bright-Thomas, Rachel & Rachel Hargest. (2003). APC, β-Catenin and hTCF-4; an unholy trinity in the genesis of colorectal cancer. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 29(2). 107–117. 61 indexed citations

9.

Bright-Thomas, Rachel, Amit Agrawal, & Rachel Hargest. (2002). Preclinical studies of gene transfer for the treatment of desmoid disease in familial adenomatous polyposis. British journal of surgery. 89(12). 1563–1569. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact