Horace Newcomb
Impact in
- Communication top 2%
- Media Studies and Communication
- Social Media and Politics
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Media, Gender, and Advertising
- Gender, Feminism, and Media
Papers in
-
- Cinema and Media Studies 5
-
- Crime and Detective Fiction Studies 2
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 1
- Discourse Analysis in Language Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Daniel J. Dieterich (1 shared paper)Paul M. Hirsch (1 shared paper)David Marc (1 shared paper)Lynn Spigel (2 shared papers)Michele Hilmes (1 shared paper)Eileen R. Meehan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Communication Research (1 paper)Journal of Communication (1 paper)Journal of Communication Inquiry (1 paper)Television & New Media (1 paper)Nordicom review/NORDICOM review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Horace Newcomb
17 papers receiving 536 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Communication 320
- Gender Studies 187
- Literature and Literary Theory 197
- Music 39
- Philosophy 130
Countries citing papers authored by Horace Newcomb
This map shows the geographic impact of Horace Newcomb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Horace Newcomb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Horace Newcomb more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Horace Newcomb
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Horace Newcomb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Horace Newcomb. The network helps show where Horace Newcomb may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Horace Newcomb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1977 | 359 | |
| 2 | 1983 | 118 | |
| 3 | TV: the most popular art | 1974 | 73 |
| 4 | 1984 | 63 | |
| 5 | 1978 | 41 | |
| 6 | The Producer's Medium: Conversations with Creators of American TV | 1983 | 39 |
| 7 | 1993 | 9 | |
| 8 | 1986 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 10 | Toward Television History: The Growth of Styles. | 1978 | 3 |
| 11 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1977 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 17 | Women's Work: Television: The Critical View | 1995 | 1 |
| 18 | 2015 | 0 | |
| 19 | Family on Television | 1997 | 0 |
About Horace Newcomb
Horace Newcomb is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Literature and Literary Theory, Communication, Philosophy and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 19 papers that have together received 728 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cinema and Media Studies (5 papers), Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (2 papers), Media Studies and Communication (2 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (1 paper), Art, Politics, and Modernism (1 paper), Media, Gender, and Advertising (1 paper), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (1 paper) and Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (320 citations), Gender Studies (187 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (197 citations), Music (39 citations) and Philosophy (130 citations). Horace Newcomb has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel J. Dieterich, Paul M. Hirsch, David Marc, Lynn Spigel, Michele Hilmes and Eileen R. Meehan. Their work appears in journals such as Communication Research, Journal of Communication, Journal of Communication Inquiry, Television & New Media and Nordicom review/NORDICOM review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.