Hila Kobo
About
In The Last Decade
Hila Kobo
6 papers receiving 149 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Molecular Biology 113
- Oncology 51
- Genetics 42
- Immunology 19
- Neurology 18
Countries citing papers authored by Hila Kobo
This map shows the geographic impact of Hila Kobo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hila Kobo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hila Kobo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hila Kobo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hila Kobo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hila Kobo. The network helps show where Hila Kobo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hila Kobo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hila Kobo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hila Kobo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hila Kobo. Hila Kobo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | Frequent aneuploidy in primary human T cells after CRISPR–Cas9 cleavage breakdown → | 122 |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 19 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.