Herwig Czech

407 citations
16 papers · 160 · h-index 8

Impact in

  • History top 2%
    • Medical History and Research
    • History of Medical Practice
    • Neurology and Historical Studies

Papers in

Herwig Czech

16 papers receiving 148 citations

Peers

Herwig Czech
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • History 68
  • Neurology 37
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 40
  • Clinical Psychology 41
  • Anatomy 2
Replace Philip J. van der Eijk with:
Philip J. van der Eijk United Kingdom
Volker Roelcke Germany
Hans‐Walter Schmuhl Germany
Michael B. Poliakoff United States
Anne Stiles United States
Shigehisa Kuriyama United States
Heinrich von Staden United States
Ties van de Werff Netherlands
John Russell Taylor United States
C. F. Goodey United Kingdom
Herwig Czech relative to Philip J. van der Eijk United Kingdom Philip J. van der Eijk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Philip J. van der Eijk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Herwig Czech

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Herwig Czech's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Herwig Czech with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Herwig Czech more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Herwig Czech

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Herwig Czech. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Herwig Czech. The network helps show where Herwig Czech may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Herwig Czech, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Herwig Czech Line = papers co-authored together Herwig Czech links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201865
2 202315
3 201813
4 201912
5 201412
6 202111
7 20218
8 20177
9 20215
10 20203
11 20212
12 20112
13 20202
14 20211
15
Österreichische Ärzte und Ärztinnen im Nationalsozialismus: Einleitung
20171
16 20201

About Herwig Czech

Herwig Czech is a scholar working on History, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Neurology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 160 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical History and Research (13 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (5 papers), European history and politics (4 papers), History of Medical Practice (3 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (2 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (2 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (2 papers) and Medicine and Dermatology Studies History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (68 citations), Neurology (37 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (40 citations), Clinical Psychology (41 citations) and Anatomy (2 citations). Herwig Czech has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Christiane Druml, Paul Weindling, Erich Brenner, Lawrence A. Zeidman, Gábor Gazdag, Markus Müller, Wolfgang J. Weninger, Carola Sachse, A Ohry and Matthew K. Wynia. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Autism, Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger, Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, East Central Europe and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact