Herbert Goldhamer
- Clinical Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
- Social Psychology
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Hans SpeierAndrew MarshallAndrew W. MarshallAugust B. HollingsheadErika BourguignonFredrick C. RedlichH. Warren DunhamRudolph E. Morris
- Topics
- Military History and Strategy (3 papers)International Relations in Latin America (2 papers)Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Statistical AssociationContemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsAmerican Sociological Review
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Herbert Goldhamer
13 papers receiving 131 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Clinical Psychology 43
- Sociology and Political Science 30
- Political Science and International Relations 27
- Social Psychology 22
- General Health Professions 21
Countries citing papers authored by Herbert Goldhamer
This map shows the geographic impact of Herbert Goldhamer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Herbert Goldhamer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Herbert Goldhamer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Herbert Goldhamer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Herbert Goldhamer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Herbert Goldhamer. The network helps show where Herbert Goldhamer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Herbert Goldhamer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Herbert Goldhamer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Herbert Goldhamer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Herbert Goldhamer. Herbert Goldhamer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | Reality and Belief in Military Affairs : A First Draft (June 1977) | 1 |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Soviet military management at the troop level | 0 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 50 | |
| 10 | The Deterrence and Strategy of Total War, 1959-1961: A Method of Analysis | 1 |
| 11 | 32 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 33 |
About Herbert Goldhamer
Herbert Goldhamer is a scholar working on General Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Museology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 175 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Military History and Strategy (3 papers), International Relations in Latin America (2 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (3 citations), Clinical Psychology (43 citations) and General Energy (2 citations). Herbert Goldhamer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Hans Speier, Andrew Marshall, Andrew W. Marshall, August B. Hollingshead, Erika Bourguignon, Fredrick C. Redlich, H. Warren Dunham, Rudolph E. Morris, Luigi Einaudi and Roger Fontaine. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and American Sociological Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.