Helmut Wolff

400 citations
25 papers · 309 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Helmut Wolff

24 papers receiving 298 citations

Peers

Helmut Wolff
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 211
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 27
  • Structural Biology 5
  • Biomedical Engineering 142
  • Mechanical Engineering 105
Replace M.W. Cresswell with:
M.W. Cresswell United States
Sergey B. Odinokov Russia
S. Topçu France
Joachim Frühauf Germany
R.W. Herfst Netherlands
Diana Tentori Mexico
Weichang Xie Germany
R. Spolaczyk Germany
Matthew Sendelbach United States
Sanjib Chatterjee India
Helmut Wolff relative to M.W. Cresswell United States M.W. Cresswell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19×
M.W. Cresswell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helmut Wolff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helmut Wolff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helmut Wolff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helmut Wolff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helmut Wolff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helmut Wolff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helmut Wolff. The network helps show where Helmut Wolff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Helmut Wolff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Helmut Wolff Line = papers co-authored together Helmut Wolff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200953
2 200644
3 201137
4 200736
5 200733
6 199428
7 200716
8 202014
9 201611
10 20105
11 20214
12 20234
13 20114
14 20113
15 20023
16 20193
17 20242
18 20122
19 20072
20 20081

About Helmut Wolff

Helmut Wolff is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 25 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (21 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (12 papers), Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies (10 papers), Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (6 papers), Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (6 papers), Near-Field Optical Microscopy (5 papers), Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (3 papers) and Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (211 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (27 citations), Structural Biology (5 citations), Biomedical Engineering (142 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (105 citations). Helmut Wolff has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gaoliang Dai, Hans‐Ulrich Danzebrink, Frank Pohlenz, Ludger Koenders, Günter Wilkening, Andrew Yacoot, Xue Zhao, Otto Jusko, Thomas Weimann and Min Xu. Their work appears in journals such as Measurement Science and Technology, Applied Physics Letters, Review of Scientific Instruments, Metrologia and Sensors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact