Sanjib Chatterjee

417 citations
48 papers · 331 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Sanjib Chatterjee

47 papers receiving 318 citations

Peers

Sanjib Chatterjee
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 252
  • Computational Mechanics 125
  • Mechanical Engineering 169
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 114
  • Media Technology 21
Replace Chiayu Ai with:
Chiayu Ai United States
Stanley S. C. Chim United States
Weichang Xie Germany
Stephan Waldner Switzerland
Katsura Otaki Japan
Pavel Novák Czechia
Noel-Iván Toto-Arellano Mexico
Bryan D. Stone United States
Ribun Onodera Japan
Zhu Luan China
Sanjib Chatterjee relative to Chiayu Ai United States Chiayu Ai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Chiayu Ai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sanjib Chatterjee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sanjib Chatterjee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sanjib Chatterjee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sanjib Chatterjee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sanjib Chatterjee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sanjib Chatterjee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sanjib Chatterjee. The network helps show where Sanjib Chatterjee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Sanjib Chatterjee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sanjib Chatterjee Line = papers co-authored together Sanjib Chatterjee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200537
2 200929
3 201623
4 200316
5 201014
6 200813
7 201012
8 200511
9 200410
10 20129
11 20099
12 20149
13 20099
14 20117
15 20027
16 20117
17 20117
18 20086
19 20106
20 20036

About Sanjib Chatterjee

Sanjib Chatterjee is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Mechanical Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 48 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optical measurement and interference techniques (40 papers), Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (27 papers), Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements (25 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (5 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (4 papers), Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (4 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (4 papers) and Optical Systems and Laser Technology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (252 citations), Computational Mechanics (125 citations), Mechanical Engineering (169 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (114 citations) and Media Technology (21 citations). Sanjib Chatterjee has collaborated with scholars based in India and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Basanta Bhaduri, Om Prakash, Aladin Zayegh, Jugdutt Singh and A.S. Joshi. Their work appears in journals such as Optical Engineering, Applied Optics, Optics & Laser Technology, Optics Letters and Optics Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact