Helen Small
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- History top 5%
- Philosophy top 10%
- Education
- Co-authors
- James RavenNaomi TadmorGeorge EliotGraham BusbyCynthia CarterLaurel BrakeMaree BernothVictoria Robinson
- Topics
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (4 papers)Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (3 papers)Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Helen Small
17 papers receiving 148 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Literature and Literary Theory 66
- Sociology and Political Science 46
- History 43
- Philosophy 22
- Education 20
Countries citing papers authored by Helen Small
This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Small's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Small with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Small more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Small
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Small. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Small. The network helps show where Helen Small may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helen Small
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helen Small. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helen Small based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helen Small. Helen Small is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | Previously unrecognised issues: Managing the health of an ageing prison and homeless population | 1 |
| 3 | Edward Upward and the Critique of Everyday Late Life | 0 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 56 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | The Practice and Representation of Reading in England | 59 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | Literature, science, psychoanalysis, 1830-1970 : essays in honour of Gillian Beer | 13 |
| 17 | The lifted veil ; Brother Jacob | 7 |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Helen Small
Helen Small is a scholar working on History, Literature and Literary Theory and Cultural Studies, having authored 22 papers that have together received 216 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (4 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (3 papers) and Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (66 citations), History (43 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (6 citations). Helen Small has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include James Raven, Naomi Tadmor, George Eliot, Graham Busby, Cynthia Carter, Laurel Brake, Maree Bernoth, Victoria Robinson, Madeleine Leonard and Donna Pankhurst. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Gender Studies, New Literary History and The English Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.