Helen Durham

19 papers receiving 205 citations

Peers

Helen Durham
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Sociology and Political Science 62
  • Plant Science 49
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45
  • Urban Studies 34
  • Economics and Econometrics 33
Replace Beatriz Cid Aguayo with:
Beatriz Cid Aguayo Chile
Saraswati Raju India
Reidar Almås Norway
Zoë A. Meletis Canada
Veronika Bennholdt‐Thomsen Germany
Susanne Stenbacka Sweden
Aby Sène-Harper United States
Matthew Henry New Zealand
Rogério Haesbaert Brazil
Pamela Shurmer‐Smith United Kingdom
Helen Durham relative to Beatriz Cid Aguayo Chile Beatriz Cid Aguayo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Beatriz Cid Aguayo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helen Durham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Durham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Durham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Durham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Durham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Durham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Durham. The network helps show where Helen Durham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helen Durham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helen Durham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helen Durham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helen Durham. Helen Durham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 2
3 0
4 9
5
Who is protected under international humanitarian law: finding a definition for 'direct participation in hostilities'
0
6
Documents on the Law of UN Peace Operations
5
7 17
8 105
9 2
10
International Humanitarian Law and the Gods of War: The Story of Athena Versus Ares
1
11 6
12 4
13 4
14 6
15
Internal Migration and Regional Population Dynamics in Europe: Sweden Case Study
15
16 4
17
Internal Migration and Regional Population Dynamics in Europe : Switzerland case study
2
18 6
19
Internal migration and regional population dynamics in Europe: Norway case study
4
20 39

About Helen Durham

Helen Durham is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Communication and Gender Studies, having authored 21 papers that have together received 237 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Law and Human Rights (4 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (4 papers) and Gender, Security, and Conflict (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (34 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (45 citations) and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (6 citations). Helen Durham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Philip Rees, Marek Kupiszewski, Tim G. Benton, Doreen Gabriel, William E. Kunin, Stephen Carver, Steven M. Sait, Robert C. Palmer, Sigrid Stagl and Vincent Bernard. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Applied Ecology and British Journal of Educational Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026