Helen Cooper
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 5%
- Epidemiology
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Speech and Hearing top 5%
- Co-authors
- Beth MiltonDavid Bowen-JonesKatie BoothGeoff GillRobert GeyerJohn WildingAdrian CoyleJo Moran‐Ellis
- Topics
- Diabetes Management and Education (11 papers)Diabetes Management and Research (10 papers)Chronic Disease Management Strategies (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaQatar
In The Last Decade
Helen Cooper
23 papers receiving 565 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 374
- Epidemiology 171
- General Health Professions 148
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 69
- Speech and Hearing 69
Countries citing papers authored by Helen Cooper
This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Cooper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Cooper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Cooper. The network helps show where Helen Cooper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helen Cooper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helen Cooper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helen Cooper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helen Cooper. Helen Cooper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | Neonatal palliative care nursing: Working with infants on the cusp of life - a thematic review | 4 |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 96 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 42 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 55 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 142 | |
| 19 | 28 | |
| 20 | Diabetes education: the patient's perspective | 2 |
About Helen Cooper
Helen Cooper is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Speech and Hearing, having authored 25 papers that have together received 597 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Management and Education (11 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (10 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (374 citations), Speech and Hearing (69 citations) and Family Practice (17 citations). Helen Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Beth Milton, David Bowen-Jones, Katie Booth, Geoff Gill, Robert Geyer, John Wilding, Adrian Coyle, Jo Moran‐Ellis, Gillian Lancaster and Victoria Senior. Their work appears in journals such as PEDIATRICS, Social Science & Medicine and Journal of Advanced Nursing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.