Heidi Möller
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Silja KotteSvenja TaubnerPeter EberlJennifer M. KlasenKathrin RosingJohannes ZimmermannHorst KächeleSiegfried Greif
- Topics
- Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (61 papers)Sociology and Education Studies (22 papers)Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyAustriaSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Heidi Möller
50 papers receiving 251 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Social Psychology 211
- Clinical Psychology 126
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 91
- Sociology and Political Science 75
- Applied Psychology 59
Countries citing papers authored by Heidi Möller
This map shows the geographic impact of Heidi Möller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heidi Möller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heidi Möller more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Heidi Möller
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heidi Möller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heidi Möller. The network helps show where Heidi Möller may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Heidi Möller
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Heidi Möller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Heidi Möller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Heidi Möller. Heidi Möller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | Entgleisungen von Führungskräften | 1 |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Der integrative Supervisionsansatz | 0 |
| 20 | Die Energie muss fließen | 2 |
About Heidi Möller
Heidi Möller is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 84 papers that have together received 311 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (61 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (22 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (59 citations), Social Psychology (211 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (91 citations). Heidi Möller has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Silja Kotte, Svenja Taubner, Peter Eberl, Jennifer M. Klasen, Kathrin Rosing, Johannes Zimmermann, Horst Kächele, Siegfried Greif, Wolfgang Schöll and Tobias Nolte. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Psychology, Human Resource Management Journal and Psychotherapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.