Heidemarie Weber
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Sociology and Political Science
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Wolf LangewitzMatthias NüblingAtanas TodorovClaudia E. KuehniAlexander KissStefan EssigClaudia SteinerLukas Heydrich
- Topics
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (6 papers)Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (5 papers)Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Advanced NursingBMC Medical Research MethodologyPatient Education and Counseling
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyChile
In The Last Decade
Heidemarie Weber
12 papers receiving 304 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- General Health Professions 204
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 103
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 56
- Sociology and Political Science 35
- Psychiatry and Mental health 35
Countries citing papers authored by Heidemarie Weber
This map shows the geographic impact of Heidemarie Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heidemarie Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heidemarie Weber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Heidemarie Weber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heidemarie Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heidemarie Weber. The network helps show where Heidemarie Weber may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Heidemarie Weber
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Heidemarie Weber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Heidemarie Weber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Heidemarie Weber. Heidemarie Weber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 49 | |
| 4 | 30 | |
| 5 | 37 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | Basler Visitenstandard - Chance für eine gelingende Interaktionstriade Patient-Arzt-Pflegefachperson The Basel Standard for Doctorʼs Visits - Chance for a Successful Interaction Triad Patient-Doctor-Nursing Staff | 1 |
| 8 | 45 | |
| 9 | 86 | |
| 10 | 25 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 3 |
About Heidemarie Weber
Heidemarie Weber is a scholar working on Family Practice, General Health Professions and Language and Linguistics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 321 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (6 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (5 papers) and Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (27 citations), General Health Professions (204 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (31 citations). Heidemarie Weber has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Wolf Langewitz, Matthias Nübling, Atanas Todorov, Claudia E. Kuehni, Alexander Kiss, Stefan Essig, Claudia Steiner, Lukas Heydrich, Paul Grossman and Anita C. Keller. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, BMC Medical Research Methodology and Patient Education and Counseling.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.