Heather Strange

662 total citations
25 papers, 393 citations indexed

About

Heather Strange is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Heather Strange has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 393 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in General Health Professions, 6 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 5 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Heather Strange's work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers) and Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (3 papers). Heather Strange is often cited by papers focused on Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers) and Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (3 papers). Heather Strange collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Heather Strange's co-authors include Olav Bjørn Petersen, Kasper Gadsbøll, Helen Morgan, Ronald J. Wapner, Joris Vermeesch, Jonathan Scourfield, Bo Jacobsson, Tom Slater, James White and Ruth Turley and has published in prestigious journals such as Archives of Disease in Childhood, BMJ Open and Health Technology Assessment.

In The Last Decade

Heather Strange

22 papers receiving 376 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Heather Strange United Kingdom	8	185	102	62	59	48	25	393
Kirsten A. Riggan United States	13	132 0.7×	61 0.6×	18 0.3×	95 1.6×	11 0.2×	54	443
Gail Andrews Canada	11	141 0.8×	66 0.6×	71 1.1×	71 1.2×	25 0.5×	19	299
Marijke J. Korenromp Netherlands	7	289 1.6×	239 2.3×	18 0.3×	120 2.0×	15 0.3×	11	475
Sandra Iverson United States	10	91 0.5×	96 0.9×	168 2.7×	25 0.4×	33 0.7×	14	347
Michelle Pentecost South Africa	10	43 0.2×	34 0.3×	13 0.2×	68 1.2×	97 2.0×	29	331
H. Mabel Preloran United States	10	158 0.9×	64 0.6×	22 0.4×	91 1.5×	8 0.2×	13	380
Janneke T. Gitsels-van der Wal Netherlands	14	309 1.7×	51 0.5×	9 0.1×	97 1.6×	33 0.7×	38	434
Elaine A Donoghue United States	6	94 0.5×	99 1.0×	46 0.7×	55 0.9×	6 0.1×	13	394
MaryAnn Campion United States	11	136 0.7×	30 0.3×	7 0.1×	88 1.5×	31 0.6×	21	406
Cynthia Holland-Hall United States	10	28 0.2×	36 0.4×	54 0.9×	72 1.2×	27 0.6×	31	328

Countries citing papers authored by Heather Strange

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Heather Strange's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heather Strange with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heather Strange more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Heather Strange

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heather Strange. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heather Strange. The network helps show where Heather Strange may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Heather Strange

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Heather Strange. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Heather Strange based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Heather Strange. Heather Strange is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Allen, Davina, Heather Strange, Nina Jacob, & Anne Marie Rafferty. (2025). How can we optimise nurse staffing systems? Insights from a comparative document analysis of 10 widely used models and focused interpretative review of implementation experiences. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 167. 105056–105056.

2.

Milton, Rebecca, Sue Channon, Julia Sanders, et al.. (2025). The SIMCA Study Protocol: Factors influencing the implementation of the Midwifery Continuity of Carer (MCoC) model of care in NHS maternity care in England: A mixed methods cross case analysis involving clinicians, women and policy makers. NIHR Open Research. 5. 4–4.

3.

Allen, Davina, et al.. (2025). Understanding Socio‐Material Relations in Nurse Staffing Systems: Insights From a Qualitative Study in England and Wales. Nursing Inquiry. 32(2). e70008–e70008. 1 indexed citations

4.

Milton, Rebecca, Sue Channon, Julia Sanders, et al.. (2025). The SIMCA Study Protocol: Factors influencing the implementation of the Midwifery Continuity of Carer (MCoC) model of care in NHS maternity care in England: A mixed methods cross case analysis involving clinicians, women and policy makers. NIHR Open Research. 5. 4–4.

5.

Strange, Heather, Melanie Morgan, Graeme K. Ambler, et al.. (2024). Rehabilitation experiences following major lower limb amputation due to complications of vascular disease: a UK qualitative study. Disability and Rehabilitation. 46(26). 6477–6486. 1 indexed citations

6.

Channon, Sue, Julia Sanders, Sara Kenyon, et al.. (2024). Barriers and facilitators when implementing midwifery continuity of carer: a narrative analysis of the international literature. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 24(1). 540–540. 8 indexed citations

7.

Strange, Heather, et al.. (2024). Using Qualitative Questionnaires in Medical Education Research. Perspectives on Medical Education. 13(1). 280–287. 3 indexed citations

8.

Channon, Sue, Rebecca Cannings‐John, Josie Henley, et al.. (2023). Acceptability and feasibility of a planned preconception weight loss intervention in women with long-acting reversible contraception: the Plan-it mixed-methods study. Health Technology Assessment. 27(1). 1–224. 1 indexed citations

9.

Skakkebæk, Anne, et al.. (2023). Inclusion of sex chromosomes in noninvasive prenatal testing in Asia, Australia, Europe and the USA: A survey study. Prenatal Diagnosis. 43(2). 144–155. 15 indexed citations

10.

Allen, Davina, Nina Jacob, Heather Strange, et al.. (2023). “It's not just about the numbers”: Inside the black box of nurses' professional judgement in nurse staffing systems in England and Wales: Insights from a qualitative cross-case comparative study. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 147. 104586–104586. 7 indexed citations

11.

Roland, Damian, Colin Powell, Amy Lloyd, et al.. (2022). Paediatric early warning systems: not a simple answer to a complex question. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 108(5). 338–343. 3 indexed citations

12.

Channon, Sue, Rebecca Cannings‐John, Josie Henley, et al.. (2022). The acceptability of asking women to delay removal of a long-acting reversible contraceptive to take part in a preconception weight loss programme: a mixed methods study using qualitative and routine data (Plan-it). BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 22(1). 778–778. 5 indexed citations

13.

Strange, Heather, Melanie Morgan, Graeme K. Ambler, et al.. (2021). Exploring patients’ experiences of analgesia after major lower limb amputation: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 11(12). e054618–e054618. 6 indexed citations

14.

Cannings‐John, Rebecca, Freya Davies, Josie Henley, et al.. (2021). The acceptability and feasibility of a planned pre-pregnancy weight loss intervention (the Plan-it Study): A Protocol Paper. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University). 7(1). 1 indexed citations

15.

Gadsbøll, Kasper, Olav Bjørn Petersen, Vincent Gâtinois, et al.. (2020). Current use of noninvasive prenatal testing in Europe, Australia and the USA: A graphical presentation. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 99(6). 722–730. 149 indexed citations

16.

Strange, Heather. (2018). The fetus as a patient: professional and patient discourse. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University). 78–93. 4 indexed citations

17.

White, James, Ruth Turley, Tom Slater, et al.. (2017). Comparison of suicidal ideation, suicide attempt and suicide in children and young people in care and non-care populations: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence. Children and Youth Services Review. 82. 122–129. 118 indexed citations

18.

Weightman, Alison, D. J. J. Farnell, Delyth Morris, Heather Strange, & Gillian Hallam. (2017). A Systematic Review of Information Literacy Programs in Higher Education: Effects of Face-to-Face, Online, and Blended Formats on Student Skills and Views. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. 12(3). 20–55. 33 indexed citations

19.

Strange, Heather. (2010). Non-medical sex selection: ethical issues. British Medical Bulletin. 94(1). 7–20. 13 indexed citations

20.

Strange, Heather & Ruth Chadwick. (2009). The Ethics of Nonmedical Sex Selection. Health Care Analysis. 18(3). 252–266. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact