Nina Jacob

480 total citations
28 papers, 257 citations indexed

About

Nina Jacob is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Nina Jacob has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 257 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in General Health Professions, 6 papers in Clinical Psychology and 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Nina Jacob's work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (5 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers). Nina Jacob is often cited by papers focused on Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (5 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers). Nina Jacob collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Qatar and Germany. Nina Jacob's co-authors include Jonathan Scourfield, Rhiannon Evans, Georgina J MacArthur, Matthew Hickman, Rona Campbell, Pandora Pound, Davina Allen, Kerenza Hood, Matthew Williams and Gualtiero B. Colombo and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Archives of Disease in Childhood.

In The Last Decade

Nina Jacob

21 papers receiving 246 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nina Jacob United Kingdom 9 87 59 59 56 46 28 257
Marina Beléndez Vázquez Spain 10 70 0.8× 49 0.8× 40 0.7× 73 1.3× 41 0.9× 48 407
Jennifer Gerard Ball United States 10 59 0.7× 65 1.1× 60 1.0× 140 2.5× 18 0.4× 19 369
Christine Adler Germany 9 69 0.8× 104 1.8× 78 1.3× 158 2.8× 11 0.2× 20 474
Sabune J. Winkler United States 5 48 0.6× 34 0.6× 97 1.6× 140 2.5× 12 0.3× 8 367
Jenni Konttila Finland 8 69 0.8× 30 0.5× 95 1.6× 164 2.9× 16 0.3× 15 383
Carra S. Sims United States 9 57 0.7× 45 0.8× 69 1.2× 44 0.8× 9 0.2× 40 262
Ali Ünlü Finland 8 38 0.4× 12 0.2× 104 1.8× 34 0.6× 73 1.6× 43 239
Joan Wharf-Higgins Canada 5 35 0.4× 27 0.5× 91 1.5× 125 2.2× 15 0.3× 7 317
Ilwoo Ju United States 9 84 1.0× 27 0.5× 102 1.7× 33 0.6× 8 0.2× 28 289
Htay-Wah Saw United States 6 76 0.9× 32 0.5× 126 2.1× 51 0.9× 7 0.2× 14 312

Countries citing papers authored by Nina Jacob

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Jacob's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Jacob with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Jacob more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Jacob

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Jacob. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Jacob. The network helps show where Nina Jacob may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Jacob

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Jacob. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Jacob based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Jacob. Nina Jacob is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Allen, Davina, Heather Strange, Nina Jacob, & Anne Marie Rafferty. (2025). How can we optimise nurse staffing systems? Insights from a comparative document analysis of 10 widely used models and focused interpretative review of implementation experiences. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 167. 105056–105056.
2.
Allen, Davina, et al.. (2025). Understanding Socio‐Material Relations in Nurse Staffing Systems: Insights From a Qualitative Study in England and Wales. Nursing Inquiry. 32(2). e70008–e70008. 1 indexed citations
5.
Howick, Jeremy, Shaun Treweek, Nina Jacob, et al.. (2023). Patient reported outcomes and recruitment rates following the introduction of principled patient information leaflets (PrinciPILs): Protocol for a meta-analysis. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 29–29. 3 indexed citations
6.
Jacob, Nina, Jeremy Howick, Shaun Treweek, et al.. (2023). Co-production of guidance and resources to implement principled participant information leaflets (PrinciPILs). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 42–42. 1 indexed citations
7.
Allen, Davina, Nina Jacob, Heather Strange, et al.. (2023). “It's not just about the numbers”: Inside the black box of nurses' professional judgement in nurse staffing systems in England and Wales: Insights from a qualitative cross-case comparative study. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 147. 104586–104586. 7 indexed citations
8.
Roland, Damian, Colin Powell, Amy Lloyd, et al.. (2022). Paediatric early warning systems: not a simple answer to a complex question. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 108(5). 338–343. 3 indexed citations
9.
Jacob, Nina, Kerenza Hood, Katie Gillies, et al.. (2022). Developing principles for sharing information about potential trial intervention benefits and harms with patients: report of a modified Delphi survey. Trials. 23(1). 863–863. 8 indexed citations
10.
Jacob, Nina, Christopher R Burton, Rachel Hale, et al.. (2021). Pro‐judge study: Nurses’ professional judgement in nurse staffing systems. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 77(10). 4226–4233. 3 indexed citations
11.
Jacob, Nina, Rhiannon Evans, & Jonathan Scourfield. (2017). The influence of online images on self‐harm: A qualitative study of young people aged 16–24. Journal of Adolescence. 60(1). 140–147. 52 indexed citations
12.
Scourfield, Jonathan, Gualtiero B. Colombo, Rhiannon Evans, et al.. (2016). The Response in Twitter to an Assisted Suicide in a Television Soap Opera. Crisis. 37(5). 392–395. 5 indexed citations
13.
Mathews, Frances, Astrid Janssens, Lucy Biddle, et al.. (2016). GW4 Children and young people's self-harm and suicide research collaboration. Report.. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University). 1 indexed citations
14.
Jacob, Nina, Georgina J MacArthur, Matthew Hickman, & Rona Campbell. (2015). A qualitative investigation of the role of the family in structuring young people’s alcohol use. European Journal of Public Health. 26(1). 102–110. 19 indexed citations
15.
Jacob, Nina. (2014). Leadership and Change Management in a Crisis Situation: A Case about Administration of an Indian District Collectorate. South Asian Journal of Management. 21(2). 151.
16.
Scourfield, Jonathan, et al.. (2007). Young people's gendered interpretations of suicide and attempted suicide. Child & Family Social Work. 12(3). 248–257. 9 indexed citations
17.
Jacob, Nina. (2007). Organizational Structure and Crosscultural Management: The Case of Credit Suisse's Project Copernicus in Singapore. Vikalpa The Journal for Decision Makers. 32(4). 63–74. 1 indexed citations
18.
Maglaveras, Nicos, Irini Lekka, Evangelos Bekiaris, et al.. (2006). SENSATION remote monitoring system for enabling the "anytime, anywhere" monitoring of patients with selected sleep disorders. PubMed. 2006. 3869–3872. 5 indexed citations
19.
Jacob, Nina. (2005). Cross‐cultural investigations: emerging concepts. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 18(5). 514–528. 45 indexed citations
20.
Jacob, Nina. (1999). Creativity in Organizations. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026