Emma Thomas‐Jones

2.8k total citations
89 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Emma Thomas‐Jones is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Thomas‐Jones has authored 89 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Epidemiology, 23 papers in Surgery and 18 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Emma Thomas‐Jones's work include Urinary Tract Infections Management (13 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (9 papers) and Antibiotic Use and Resistance (7 papers). Emma Thomas‐Jones is often cited by papers focused on Urinary Tract Infections Management (13 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (9 papers) and Antibiotic Use and Resistance (7 papers). Emma Thomas‐Jones collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Spain. Emma Thomas‐Jones's co-authors include Kerenza Hood, Christopher Butler, Nick Francis, Mandy Wootton, David Gillespie, Randall K. Ten Haken, Marc L. Kessler, O. Chapet, Micaela Gal and Nigel Kirby and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Emma Thomas‐Jones

84 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emma Thomas‐Jones United Kingdom 21 347 321 190 147 130 89 1.3k
Daniel Dedman United Kingdom 16 339 1.0× 441 1.4× 207 1.1× 38 0.3× 116 0.9× 36 1.5k
Janice M. Leung Canada 25 726 2.1× 1.1k 3.5× 132 0.7× 75 0.5× 55 0.4× 80 2.3k
Chang Hwan Sohn South Korea 21 493 1.4× 259 0.8× 360 1.9× 140 1.0× 34 0.3× 111 1.6k
Paolo Bonfanti Italy 26 437 1.3× 290 0.9× 163 0.9× 84 0.6× 56 0.4× 140 2.3k
Trine Frøslev Denmark 18 351 1.0× 258 0.8× 364 1.9× 85 0.6× 83 0.6× 47 1.6k
Kathy Welch United States 18 567 1.6× 341 1.1× 644 3.4× 182 1.2× 77 0.6× 31 2.3k
Septimiu Voidăzan Romania 21 269 0.8× 176 0.5× 301 1.6× 57 0.4× 38 0.3× 128 1.3k
John Salazar‐Schicchi United States 10 244 0.7× 377 1.2× 135 0.7× 80 0.5× 124 1.0× 17 1.8k
Janet Alexander Australia 15 726 2.1× 335 1.0× 175 0.9× 102 0.7× 57 0.4× 27 1.3k
Yung‐Feng Yen Taiwan 21 440 1.3× 121 0.4× 204 1.1× 57 0.4× 107 0.8× 99 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Thomas‐Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Thomas‐Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Thomas‐Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Thomas‐Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Thomas‐Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Thomas‐Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Thomas‐Jones. The network helps show where Emma Thomas‐Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Thomas‐Jones

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Thomas‐Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Thomas‐Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Thomas‐Jones. Emma Thomas‐Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Edwards, Adrian, Ridhi Agarwal, Emma Thomas‐Jones, et al.. (2025). Development of a clinical decision support tool for Primary care Management of lower Urinary tract Symptoms in men: the PriMUS study. Health Technology Assessment. 29(1). 1–140.
3.
Strange, Heather, Melanie Morgan, Graeme K. Ambler, et al.. (2024). Rehabilitation experiences following major lower limb amputation due to complications of vascular disease: a UK qualitative study. Disability and Rehabilitation. 46(26). 6477–6486. 1 indexed citations
4.
Ingram, John R, Janine Bates, Rebecca Cannings‐John, et al.. (2023). Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Evaluation Study: the THESEUS prospective cohort study. Health Technology Assessment. 27(30). 1–107. 3 indexed citations
6.
Webb, Edward, Natalie King, Daniel Howdon, et al.. (2023). Evidence of quality of life for hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a scoping review. Health Technology Assessment. 29(52). 1–23.
7.
Gillespie, David, Nick Francis, Haroon Ahmed, et al.. (2022). Associations with Post-Consultation Health-Status in Primary Care Managed Acute Exacerbation of COPD. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1 indexed citations
8.
Waldron, Cherry-Ann, Emma Thomas‐Jones, Jolanta Bernatoniene, et al.. (2022). Biomarker-guided duration of Antibiotic Treatment in Children Hospitalised with confirmed or suspected bacterial infection (BATCH): protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 12(1). e047490–e047490. 3 indexed citations
9.
Bates, Janine, Rebecca Cannings‐John, Kim S Thomas, et al.. (2022). Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Evaluation Study (THESEUS): protocol for a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 12(4). e060815–e060815. 5 indexed citations
10.
Roland, Damian, Colin Powell, Amy Lloyd, et al.. (2022). Paediatric early warning systems: not a simple answer to a complex question. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 108(5). 338–343. 3 indexed citations
11.
Phillips, Rhiannon, David Gillespie, Britt Hallingberg, et al.. (2022). Perceived threat of COVID-19, attitudes towards vaccination, and vaccine hesitancy: A prospective longitudinal study in the UK. Figshare. 2 indexed citations
12.
Strange, Heather, Melanie Morgan, Graeme K. Ambler, et al.. (2021). Exploring patients’ experiences of analgesia after major lower limb amputation: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 11(12). e054618–e054618. 6 indexed citations
14.
Thomas‐Jones, Emma, Ridhi Agarwal, Haroon Ahmed, et al.. (2020). PRImary care Management of lower Urinary tract Symptoms in men: protocol for development and validation of a diagnostic and clinical decision support tool (the PriMUS study). BMJ Open. 10(6). e037634–e037634. 6 indexed citations
15.
Ambler, Graeme K., Lucy Brookes‐Howell, David C. Bosanquet, et al.. (2020). Development of Core Outcome Sets for People Undergoing Major Lower Limb Amputation for Complications of Peripheral Vascular Disease. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 60(5). 730–738. 26 indexed citations
16.
Bosanquet, David C., Graeme K. Ambler, Cherry-Ann Waldron, et al.. (2019). Perineural local anaesthetic catheter after major lower limb amputation trial (PLACEMENT): results from a randomised controlled feasibility trial. BMJ Open. 9(11). e029233–e029233. 10 indexed citations
17.
Gillespie, David, Nick Francis, Enitan D. Carrol, et al.. (2018). Use of co-primary outcomes for trials of antimicrobial stewardship interventions. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 18(6). 595–597. 11 indexed citations
18.
19.
Hollingworth, William, John Busby, Christopher Butler, et al.. (2017). The Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection in Young Children (DUTY) Study Clinical Rule: Economic Evaluation. Value in Health. 20(4). 556–566. 9 indexed citations
20.
Robling, Michael, Kristina Bennert, Sue Channon, et al.. (2011). Development and evaluation by a cluster randomised trial of a psychosocial intervention in children and teenagers experiencing diabetes: the DEPICTED study. Health Technology Assessment. 15(29). 1–202. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026