Hazel Perfect
-
- Advanced Algebra and Logic 9
- Matrix Theory and Algorithms 6
- semigroups and automata theory 4
- Geometry and Topology top 5%
- Advanced Topology and Set Theory 5
- Mathematics and Applications 3
- Numerical Analysis top 10%
-
- Digital Image Processing Techniques 7
-
- graph theory and CDMA systems 7
-
- Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory 3
- Cited by
- Computational Theory and MathematicsGeometry and TopologyDiscrete Mathematics and Combinatorics
- Journals
- Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (5 papers)Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications (4 papers)Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Hazel Perfect
32 papers receiving 468 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 402
- Geometry and Topology 143
- Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 52
- Algebra and Number Theory 61
- Numerical Analysis 64
Countries citing papers authored by Hazel Perfect
This map shows the geographic impact of Hazel Perfect's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hazel Perfect with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hazel Perfect more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hazel Perfect
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hazel Perfect. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hazel Perfect. The network helps show where Hazel Perfect may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Hazel Perfect, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1988 | 10 | |
| 3 | 1984 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1981 | 3 | |
| 6 | Hereditary circuit spaces | 1978 | 2 |
| 7 | 1977 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1972 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1970 | 24 | |
| 10 | 1969 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1969 | 11 | |
| 12 | 1969 | 15 | |
| 13 | 1968 | 61 | |
| 14 | 1967 | 44 | |
| 15 | 1966 | 45 | |
| 16 | 1966 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1965 | 56 | |
| 18 | 1964 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1956 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1955 | 87 |
About Hazel Perfect
Hazel Perfect is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Applied Mathematics, having authored 36 papers that have together received 557 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Algebra and Logic (9 papers), Digital Image Processing Techniques (7 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (7 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (6 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (5 papers), semigroups and automata theory (4 papers), Mathematics and Applications (3 papers) and Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (402 citations), Geometry and Topology (143 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (52 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (61 citations) and Numerical Analysis (64 citations). Hazel Perfect has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include L. Mirsky, John Pym, Victor Bryant, Richard A. Brualdi, H. Burkill and Walter Ledermann. Their work appears in journals such as Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, Duke Mathematical Journal and Journal of the London Mathematical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.