Hayley M. Geyle

2.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
17 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Hayley M. Geyle is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecological Modeling and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Hayley M. Geyle has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Ecology, 11 papers in Ecological Modeling and 6 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Hayley M. Geyle's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (15 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (11 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers). Hayley M. Geyle is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (15 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (11 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers). Hayley M. Geyle collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Hayley M. Geyle's co-authors include Stephen T. Garnett, Ian Leiper, Kerstin K. Zander, James Watson, Álvaro Fernández‐Llamazares, Beau J. Austin, Neil Collier, Neil D. Burgess, Eduardo S. Brondízio and Zsolt Molnár and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Biological Conservation and Nature Sustainability.

In The Last Decade

Hayley M. Geyle

17 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

A spatial overview of the... 2018 2026 2020 2023 2018 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Hayley M. Geyle Australia 10 549 463 217 206 150 17 1.2k
Robin Roth Canada 9 496 0.9× 548 1.2× 172 0.8× 204 1.0× 324 2.2× 16 1.3k
Irene Pérez Spain 20 548 1.0× 478 1.0× 318 1.5× 177 0.9× 144 1.0× 54 1.4k
Ian Leiper Australia 10 516 0.9× 639 1.4× 185 0.9× 130 0.6× 218 1.5× 18 1.4k
Helen Newing United Kingdom 13 474 0.9× 424 0.9× 146 0.7× 111 0.5× 212 1.4× 30 1.2k
Deborah Curran Canada 10 458 0.8× 539 1.2× 160 0.7× 199 1.0× 318 2.1× 25 1.3k
Rebecca Thomas United States 10 589 1.1× 568 1.2× 186 0.9× 213 1.0× 344 2.3× 19 1.4k
Mariella Marzano United Kingdom 23 628 1.1× 767 1.7× 254 1.2× 238 1.2× 162 1.1× 65 1.9k
Georgina Cullman United States 6 600 1.1× 728 1.6× 193 0.9× 239 1.2× 403 2.7× 8 1.6k
T. Bruce Lauber United States 20 610 1.1× 386 0.8× 210 1.0× 99 0.5× 220 1.5× 94 1.3k
João Vitor Campos‐Silva Brazil 19 505 0.9× 400 0.9× 330 1.5× 89 0.4× 123 0.8× 53 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Hayley M. Geyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hayley M. Geyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hayley M. Geyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hayley M. Geyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hayley M. Geyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hayley M. Geyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hayley M. Geyle. The network helps show where Hayley M. Geyle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hayley M. Geyle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hayley M. Geyle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hayley M. Geyle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hayley M. Geyle. Hayley M. Geyle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Garnett, Stephen T., John C. Z. Woinarski, G. Barry Baker, et al.. (2024). Monitoring threats to Australian threatened birds: climate change was the biggest threat in 2020 with minimal progress on its management. Emu - Austral Ornithology. 124(1). 37–54. 6 indexed citations
2.
Geyle, Hayley M., Christine Schlesinger, Sam C. Banks, et al.. (2024). Unravelling predator–prey interactions in response to planned fire: a case study from the Tanami Desert. Wildlife Research. 51(8). 2 indexed citations
3.
Davis, Robert A., Ayesha Tulloch, Sarah Legge, et al.. (2024). Trends in monitoring of Australia’s threatened birds (1990–2020): much improved but still inadequate. Emu - Austral Ornithology. 124(1). 21–36. 9 indexed citations
4.
Garnett, Stephen T., G. Barry Baker, Nicholas Carlile, et al.. (2024). Australian threatened birds for which the risk of extinction declined between 1990 and 2020. Emu - Austral Ornithology. 124(1). 68–82. 3 indexed citations
6.
Garnett, Stephen T., R. Keller Kopf, John C. Z. Woinarski, et al.. (2022). Australia's most imperilled vertebrates. Biological Conservation. 270. 109561–109561. 23 indexed citations
7.
Fraser, Hannah, Sarah Legge, Stephen T. Garnett, et al.. (2022). Application of expert elicitation to estimate population trajectories for species prioritized in Australia's first threatened species strategy. Biological Conservation. 274. 109731–109731. 9 indexed citations
8.
Woinarski, John C. Z., Sarah Legge, Russell Palmer, et al.. (2020). Predation by introduced cats Felis catus on Australian frogs: compilation of species records and estimation of numbers killed. Wildlife Research. 47(8). 580–588. 26 indexed citations
9.
Geyle, Hayley M., M. L. Stevens, Dale G. Nimmo, et al.. (2020). Evaluation of camera placement for detection of free‐ranging carnivores; implications for assessing population changes. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(1). 26 indexed citations
10.
Geyle, Hayley M., et al.. (2020). Targeted sampling successfully detects the cryptic and declining arboreal marsupial (Phascogale pirata) in northern Australia. Pacific Conservation Biology. 26(4). 395–403. 6 indexed citations
11.
Lintermans, Mark, Hayley M. Geyle, S.J. Beatty, et al.. (2020). Big trouble for little fish: identifying Australian freshwater fishes in imminent risk of extinction. Pacific Conservation Biology. 26(4). 365–377. 45 indexed citations
12.
Murphy, Brett P., Hayley M. Geyle, Sarah Legge, et al.. (2020). Introduced cats eating a continental fauna: invertebrate consumption by feral cats (Felis catus) in Australia. Wildlife Research. 47(8). 610–623. 19 indexed citations
13.
Scheele, Ben C., Sarah Legge, Wade Blanchard, et al.. (2019). Continental-scale assessment reveals inadequate monitoring for threatened vertebrates in a megadiverse country. Biological Conservation. 235. 273–278. 63 indexed citations
14.
Geyle, Hayley M., John C. Z. Woinarski, G. Barry Baker, et al.. (2018). Quantifying extinction risk and forecasting the number of impending Australian bird and mammal extinctions. Pacific Conservation Biology. 24(2). 157–167. 75 indexed citations
15.
Geyle, Hayley M., Gurutzeta Guillera‐Arroita, Hugh F. Davies, et al.. (2018). Towards meaningful monitoring: A case study of a threatened rodent. Austral Ecology. 44(2). 223–236. 14 indexed citations
16.
Garnett, Stephen T., Neil D. Burgess, Julia E. Fa, et al.. (2018). A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation. Nature Sustainability. 1(7). 369–374. 784 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Davies, Hugh F., Michael A. McCarthy, John C. Z. Woinarski, et al.. (2016). Top‐down control of species distributions: feral cats driving the regional extinction of a threatened rodent in northern Australia. Diversity and Distributions. 23(3). 272–283. 52 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026