Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation
2018784 citationsStephen T. Garnett, Neil D. Burgess et al.Nature Sustainabilityprofile →
A Communication-Based Marketing Model for Managing Relationships
1998725 citationsTom Duncan, Sandra E. MoriartyJournal of Marketingprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Duncan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Duncan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Duncan more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Duncan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Duncan. The network helps show where Tom Duncan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom Duncan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom Duncan.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom Duncan based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tom Duncan. Tom Duncan is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Garnett, Stephen T., Neil D. Burgess, Julia E. Fa, et al.. (2018). A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation. Nature Sustainability. 1(7). 369–374.784 indexed citations breakdown →
Sandell, Richard, et al.. (2014). Prisoners, Punishment and Torture: Developing new approaches to interpretation at the Tower of London. Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester).1 indexed citations
Duncan, Tom. (2005). IMC IN INDUSTRY: MORE TALK THAN WALK. Journal of Advertising. 34(4). 5–6.10 indexed citations
12.
Trager, Robert, Sandra E. Moriarty, & Tom Duncan. (2005). Selling Influence: Using Advertising to Prejudice the Jury Pool. Nebraska law review. 83(3). 3.
Duncan, Tom. (2003). INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) INDIVIDUAL STORM WATER DISCHARGE PERMIT.1 indexed citations
15.
Duncan, Tom. (2001). Imc: Using Advertising and Promotion to Build Brands. Medical Entomology and Zoology.182 indexed citations
16.
Duncan, Tom & Sandra E. Moriarty. (1998). A Communication-Based Marketing Model for Managing Relationships. Journal of Marketing. 62(2). 1–13.725 indexed citations breakdown →
Duncan, Tom & Sandra E. Moriarty. (1997). Driving brand value : using integrated marketing to manage profitable stakeholder relationships. McGraw-Hill eBooks.130 indexed citations
19.
Moriarty, Sandra E. & Tom Duncan. (1989). How to Create and Deliver Winning Advertising Presentations. Medical Entomology and Zoology.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.