Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Stirring by chaotic advection
19841.4k citationsHassan ArefJournal of Fluid Mechanicsprofile →
Passive mixing in a three-dimensional serpentine microchannel
2000954 citationsMark A. Stremler, Hassan Aref et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Hassan Aref's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hassan Aref with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hassan Aref more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hassan Aref. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hassan Aref. The network helps show where Hassan Aref may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hassan Aref
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hassan Aref.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hassan Aref based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Hassan Aref. Hassan Aref is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Aref, Hassan. (2010). IUTAM Symposium on 150 Years of Vortex Dynamics: Proceedings of the IUTAM Symposium 150 Years of Vortex Dynamics held at the Technical University of Denmark, October 12-16, 2008. Springer eBooks.1 indexed citations
4.
Aref, Hassan & E. van der Giessen. (2007). Advances in applied mechanics - Preface. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 41.1 indexed citations
Aref, Hassan & J. W. Phillips. (2001). Mechanics for a new millennium : proceedings of the 20th International Congress of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 27 August-2 September 2000. Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks.2 indexed citations
9.
Pushkin, Dmitri O. & Hassan Aref. (1999). Coagulation in particle-laden flows. APS Division of Fluid Dynamics Meeting Abstracts.1 indexed citations
10.
Stremler, Mark A. & Hassan Aref. (1998). Chaotic advection in a static microscale mixer. APS Division of Fluid Dynamics Meeting Abstracts.2 indexed citations
11.
Aref, Hassan. (1997). Mixing well using chaos. APS.1 indexed citations
12.
Aref, Hassan & Μ.S. El Naschie. (1995). Chaos applied to fluid mixing. Pergamon eBooks.91 indexed citations
13.
Aref, Hassan, Richard Charles, & T. Todd Elvins. (1994). Scientific visualization of fluid flow. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. eBooks. 7–44.2 indexed citations
14.
Aref, Hassan, et al.. (1991). On the geometry of composite bubbles. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 434(1891). 441–447.6 indexed citations
15.
Aref, Hassan. (1990). Chaotic advection of fluid particles. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A Physical and Engineering Sciences. 333(1631). 273–288.107 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.