Caroline Williams
- Clinical Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- General Health Professions
- Health top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Helen DermatisManuel TrujilloGregory BuntMarc GalanterJohn AlbarranJulie ScholesEnrico G. CastilloStephen Kellett
- Topics
- Archaeology and Historical Studies (6 papers)Digital and Traditional Archives Management (3 papers)Archaeological Research and Protection (3 papers)
- Journals
- The British Journal of PsychiatrySupportive Care in CancerJournal of Substance Abuse Treatment
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Caroline Williams
33 papers receiving 365 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Clinical Psychology 105
- Sociology and Political Science 94
- General Health Professions 80
- Health 72
- Social Psychology 69
Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Williams. The network helps show where Caroline Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Caroline Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Caroline Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Caroline Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Caroline Williams. Caroline Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | Assertive outreach in mental healthcare : current perspectives | 9 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 64 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 102 | |
| 12 | Studying Reality: The Application of Theory in an Aspect of UK Practice | 2 |
| 13 | The Glory of Cairo: An Illustrated History | 0 |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | Transforming the old: Cairo's new medieval city | 10 |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | Contemporary French Philosophy | 3 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Caroline Williams
Caroline Williams is a scholar working on Space and Planetary Science, Research and Theory and Conservation, having authored 42 papers that have together received 435 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and Historical Studies (6 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (3 papers) and Archaeological Research and Protection (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (13 citations), Space and Planetary Science (18 citations) and Conservation (33 citations). Caroline Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Helen Dermatis, Manuel Trujillo, Gregory Bunt, Marc Galanter, John Albarran, Julie Scholes, Enrico G. Castillo, Stephen Kellett, Melanie Simmonds‐Buckley and Garry Squires. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Supportive Care in Cancer and Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.