H. Smith
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Cultural Differences and Values
Papers in
-
- Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions 2
-
- Steroid Chemistry and Biochemistry 4
- Co-authors
- Iain Walker (1 shared paper)James B. Richardson (1 shared paper)Alan Tennant (1 shared paper)W. B. Whalley (2 shared papers)Elijah C. Walker (1 shared paper)Joel S. Mindel (1 shared paper)Arthur J. Birch (2 shared papers)Randal W. Richards (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (4 papers)Tetrahedron (3 papers)Optometry and Vision Science (1 paper)Otology & Neurotology (1 paper)Health Expectations (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
H. Smith
18 papers receiving 614 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Ophthalmology 86
- Social Psychology 133
- Sociology and Political Science 238
- Gender Studies 41
- Applied Psychology 20
Countries citing papers authored by H. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of H. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Smith. The network helps show where H. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 310 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 65 | |
| 3 | 1963 | 50 | |
| 4 | 1959 | 49 | |
| 5 | 1980 | 49 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 39 | |
| 7 | 1962 | 31 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 30 | |
| 9 | 1964 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 17 | |
| 11 | 1970 | 17 | |
| 12 | 1963 | 9 | |
| 13 | 1966 | 6 | |
| 14 | 1959 | 3 | |
| 15 | The use of visual function measures for predicting a relocating prism for patients with AMD | 2003 | 2 |
| 16 | 1971 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 0 |
About H. Smith
H. Smith is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology, Epidemiology and Otorhinolaryngology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 701 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Steroid Chemistry and Biochemistry (4 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (2 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (2 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (2 papers) and Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (86 citations), Social Psychology (133 citations), Sociology and Political Science (238 citations), Gender Studies (41 citations) and Applied Psychology (20 citations). H. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Iain Walker, James B. Richardson, Alan Tennant, W. B. Whalley, Elijah C. Walker, Joel S. Mindel, Arthur J. Birch, Randal W. Richards, Robert A. Harper and Christine Dickinson. Their work appears in journals such as Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, Tetrahedron, Optometry and Vision Science, Otology & Neurotology and Health Expectations.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.