H. R. Ford

698 total citations
24 papers, 514 citations indexed

About

H. R. Ford is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Insect Science and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, H. R. Ford has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 514 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 8 papers in Insect Science and 7 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in H. R. Ford's work include Mosquito-borne diseases and control (13 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (7 papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (6 papers). H. R. Ford is often cited by papers focused on Mosquito-borne diseases and control (13 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (7 papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (6 papers). H. R. Ford collaborates with scholars based in United States. H. R. Ford's co-authors include C. S. Lofgren, D. E. Weidhaas, David A. Dame, R. S. Patterson, D. A. Dame, G. A. Mount, John E. Scanlon, Douglas J. Gould, Michael F. Sullivan and Geoffrey M. Jeffery and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

In The Last Decade

H. R. Ford

22 papers receiving 417 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
H. R. Ford United States 12 311 274 111 107 52 24 514
H. F. Schoof United States 13 300 1.0× 176 0.6× 47 0.4× 162 1.5× 62 1.2× 103 554
D. A. Dame United States 16 502 1.6× 414 1.5× 204 1.8× 217 2.0× 54 1.0× 54 772
Gordon Surtees Italy 14 263 0.8× 154 0.6× 120 1.1× 296 2.8× 74 1.4× 40 476
R. W. Fay United States 14 234 0.8× 471 1.7× 70 0.6× 228 2.1× 107 2.1× 39 606
L. S. Self Philippines 10 146 0.5× 121 0.4× 65 0.6× 149 1.4× 79 1.5× 30 358
David A. Dame United States 12 619 2.0× 499 1.8× 174 1.6× 176 1.6× 41 0.8× 29 820
Robert I. Rose United States 9 288 0.9× 220 0.8× 116 1.0× 142 1.3× 49 0.9× 11 433
W. Häusermann United States 8 143 0.5× 388 1.4× 42 0.4× 101 0.9× 130 2.5× 10 463
R. E. Lowe United States 13 197 0.6× 123 0.4× 122 1.1× 109 1.0× 29 0.6× 30 309
Charles L. Graham United States 8 100 0.3× 132 0.5× 42 0.4× 92 0.9× 48 0.9× 15 291

Countries citing papers authored by H. R. Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. R. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. R. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. R. Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. R. Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. R. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. R. Ford. The network helps show where H. R. Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. R. Ford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. R. Ford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. R. Ford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. R. Ford. H. R. Ford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lofgren, C. S., et al.. (1974). Release of Chemosterilized Males for the Control of Anopheles Albimanus in El Salvador. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 23(2). 288–297. 82 indexed citations
2.
Lowe, R. E., H. R. Ford, B. J. Smittle, & D. E. Weidhaas. (1973). Reproductive behaviour of Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus released into a natural population.. Mosquito news. 33(2). 2 indexed citations
3.
Patterson, R. S., et al.. (1971). Techniques for sterilizing large numbers of mosquitoes.. Mosquito news. 31(1). 85–90. 2 indexed citations
4.
Weidhaas, D. E., R. S. Patterson, C. S. Lofgren, & H. R. Ford. (1971). Bionomics of a population of Culex pipiens quinquefasciatusSay.. Mosquito news. 31(2). 177–182. 4 indexed citations
5.
Patterson, R. S., H. R. Ford, C. S. Lofgren, & D. E. Weidhaas. (1970). Sterile males: their effect on an isolated population of mosquitoes.. Mosquito news. 30(1). 7 indexed citations
6.
Weidhaas, D. E., M. C. Bowman, G. A. Mount, C. S. Lofgren, & H. R. Ford. (1970). Relationship of minimum lethal dose to the optimum size of droplets of insecticides for mosquito control.. Mosquito news. 30(2). 195–200. 10 indexed citations
7.
Mount, G. A., et al.. (1970). Droplet size, density, distribution and effectiveness in ultra-low volume aerial sprays dispersed with Teejet nozzles.. Mosquito news. 30(4). 3 indexed citations
8.
Lofgren, C. S., et al.. (1970). The effectiveness of ultra-low-volume applications of malathion at a rate of 3 US fluid ounces per acre in controlling Aedes aegypti in Thailand.. PubMed. 42(1). 27–35. 8 indexed citations
9.
Lofgren, C. S., H. R. Ford, R. J. Tonn, & Sujarti Jatanasen. (1970). Equipping a multi-engined aircraft with a fuselage-mounted spray system for the ultra-low-volume application of malathion.. PubMed. 42(1). 157–63. 4 indexed citations
10.
Patterson, R. S., D. E. Weidhaas, H. R. Ford, & C. S. Lofgren. (1970). Suppression and Elimination of an Island Population of Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus with Sterile Males. Science. 168(3937). 1368–1370. 62 indexed citations
11.
Gould, Douglas J., G. A. Mount, John E. Scanlon, H. R. Ford, & Michael F. Sullivan. (1970). Ecology and Control of Dengue Vectors on an Island in the Gulf of Thailand. Journal of Medical Entomology. 7(4). 499–508. 65 indexed citations
12.
Lofgren, C. S., H. R. Ford, R. J. Tonn, & Sujarti Jatanasen. (1970). The effectiveness of ultra-low-volume applications of malathion at a rate of 6 US fluid ounces per acre in controlling Aedes aegypti in a large-scale test at Nakhon Sawan, Thailand.. PubMed. 42(1). 15–25. 24 indexed citations
13.
Dame, David A. & H. R. Ford. (1968). Multiple mating ofGlossina morsitansWestw. and its potential effect on the sterile male technique. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 58(2). 213–219. 28 indexed citations
14.
Bowman, M. C., H. R. Ford, C. S. Lofgren, & D. E. Weidhaas. (1968). Residues of Abate®: Analysis in Mosquito Larvae and Larvicide Suspensions by Flame Photometric Gas Chromatography2. Journal of Economic Entomology. 61(6). 1586–1589. 11 indexed citations
15.
Dame, David A. & H. R. Ford. (1966). Effect of the chemosterilant tepa on Glossina morsitans Westw.. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 56(4). 649–658. 36 indexed citations
16.
Weidhaas, D. E., et al.. (1965). Biology of Anopheles quadrimaculatus under Field Conditions in Central Florida. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 58(2). 145–150. 2 indexed citations
17.
Dame, D. A., et al.. (1964). Chemosterilization of Aedes aegypti (L.) by larval treatments.. Mosquito news. 24(1). 1–6. 10 indexed citations
18.
Dame, D. A., et al.. (1964). FIELD BEHAVIOR OF SEXUALLY STERILE ANOPHELES QUADRIMACULATUS MALES. Mosquito news. 24(1). 6–14. 30 indexed citations
19.
Dame, David A. & H. R. Ford. (1964). Chemosterilization and its Permanency in Mosquitoes. Nature. 201(4920). 733–734. 15 indexed citations
20.
Weidhaas, D. E., et al.. (1959). Relative Susceptibility of Salt-Marsh Mosquitoes from Georgia and Florida to Insecticides. Florida Entomologist. 42(3). 109–109.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026