Countries citing papers authored by John E. Scanlon
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Scanlon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Scanlon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Scanlon more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Scanlon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Scanlon. The network helps show where John E. Scanlon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John E. Scanlon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John E. Scanlon.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John E. Scanlon based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John E. Scanlon. John E. Scanlon is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bergkamp, Ger, et al.. (2007). Fluxo : elementos essenciais de fluxos ambientais. IUCN eBooks.
5.
Scanlon, John E., et al.. (2005). A novel-molecular ecology approach to ascertaining emigration/immigration and potential disease spread in feral pigs. Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University).1 indexed citations
Scanlon, John E. & Françoise Burhenne-Guilmin. (2004). International environmental governance : an international regime for protected areas. Medical Entomology and Zoology.6 indexed citations
Glancey, B. M., et al.. (1968). Abate and Dursban Against Aedes Aegypti (L.) Breeding in Concrete Water Jars in Bangkok, Thailand. Mosquito news. 28(2).1 indexed citations
10.
Scanlon, John E., J. A. Reíd, & W. H. Cheong. (1968). Ecology of anopheles vectors of malaria in the oriental region. 6. 237–246.8 indexed citations
11.
Lofgren, C. S., et al.. (1967). Evaluation of insecticides against Aedes aegypti (L.) and Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae) in Bangkok, Thailand.. Mosquito news. 27(1). 16–21.6 indexed citations
12.
Scanlon, John E.. (1967). Control of Aedes aegypti (Linn.) in Southeast Asia.. PubMed. 20 Suppl. 108–12.2 indexed citations
13.
Scanlon, John E., E. L. Peyton, & Douglas J. Gould. (1967). Proceedings and papers of the Thirty-fifth Annual Conference of the California Mosquito Control Association, Inc. The Anopheles (Cellia) leucosphyrus Donitz 1901 group in Thailand..2 indexed citations
14.
Scanlon, John E., et al.. (1966). Notes on a laboratory colony of Anopheles balabacensis Baisas, 1936.. Mosquito news. 26(4).10 indexed citations
15.
Scanlon, John E.. (1966). Bangkok haemorrhagic fever investigations: the 1962-63 mosquito collections.. PubMed. 35(1). 82–3.9 indexed citations
16.
Scanlon, John E., et al.. (1965). Distribution in Altitude of Mosquitoes in Northern Thailand.. Mosquito news. 25(2).16 indexed citations
Eldridge, Bruce F., et al.. (1963). Notes on the laboratory rearing of sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae).. Mosquito news. 23(3).5 indexed citations
19.
Scherer, W. F., et al.. (1959). Ecologic studies of Japanese encephalitis virus in Japan. III. Mosquito factors. Zootropism and vertical flight of Culex tritaeniorhynchus with observations on variations in collections from animal-baited traps in different habitats.. PubMed. 8. 665–77.109 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.