Guosheng Deng
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Scott KennedyChien‐Chung HuangElaine JeffreysShuang LuHelen McCabeShannon CheungCongcong ZhangShuyan Zhang
- Topics
- Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (6 papers)China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (4 papers)Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Guosheng Deng
24 papers receiving 336 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Sociology and Political Science 195
- Political Science and International Relations 103
- Strategy and Management 65
- Clinical Psychology 43
- Economics and Econometrics 34
Countries citing papers authored by Guosheng Deng
This map shows the geographic impact of Guosheng Deng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guosheng Deng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guosheng Deng more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Guosheng Deng
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guosheng Deng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guosheng Deng. The network helps show where Guosheng Deng may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Guosheng Deng
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Guosheng Deng. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Guosheng Deng based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Guosheng Deng. Guosheng Deng is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 103 | |
| 18 | 76 | |
| 19 | The Analysis on Characteristic and Role of Private Non-enterprise Organizations in China | 1 |
| 20 | 5 |
About Guosheng Deng
Guosheng Deng is a scholar working on Public Administration, Business and International Management and Safety Research, having authored 25 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (6 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (4 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (31 citations), Public Administration (27 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (195 citations). Guosheng Deng has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Scott Kennedy, Chien‐Chung Huang, Elaine Jeffreys, Shuang Lu, Chien‐Chung Huang, Helen McCabe, Shannon Cheung, Congcong Zhang, Shuyan Zhang and Yafan Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, Frontiers in Psychology and Frontiers in Endocrinology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.