Thomas Preston
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Social Psychology
- Communication top 10%
- Public Administration top 5%
- Co-authors
- Paul ‘t HartMargaret G. HermannArjen BoinAllan McConnellTimothy M. ShawStephen Benedict DysonNathan CaplanGary S. Gregg
- Topics
- Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers)Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (2 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Thomas Preston
18 papers receiving 552 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Sociology and Political Science 338
- Political Science and International Relations 300
- Social Psychology 62
- Communication 61
- Public Administration 54
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Preston
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Preston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Preston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Preston more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Preston
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Preston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Preston. The network helps show where Thomas Preston may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Preston
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Preston. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Preston based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Preston. Thomas Preston is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | Pengantar psikologi politik = Introduction to political psychology | 0 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 153 | |
| 7 | 52 | |
| 8 | Patient-Directed Dying: A Call for Legalized Aid in Dying for the Terminally Ill | 1 |
| 9 | 97 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 109 | |
| 12 | 74 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 71 | |
| 17 | Resting and total energy expenditure in patients with ischemic heart disease. | 3 |
| 18 | Indications for pacing in the treatment of bradyarrhythmias. Report of an independent study group. | 5 |
| 19 | 36 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Thomas Preston
Thomas Preston is a scholar working on General Psychology, Communication and Anthropology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 642 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers), Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (2 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (54 citations), Political Science and International Relations (300 citations) and Development (43 citations). Thomas Preston has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paul ‘t Hart, Margaret G. Hermann, Arjen Boin, Allan McConnell, Timothy M. Shaw, Stephen Benedict Dyson, Nathan Caplan, Gary S. Gregg, Martha L. Cottam and Koel Das. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Journal of Vision and Political Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.