Guendalina Capece
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Marketing top 5%
- Information Systems and Management top 5%
- Information Systems top 10%
- Co-authors
- Francesca Di PilloRoberta CostaDomenico CampisiNathan LevialdiArmando CalabreseLivio CricelliFrancesco PasqualeNathan Levialdi Ghiron
- Topics
- Italy: Economic History and Contemporary Issues (6 papers)Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (6 papers)Digital Communication and Language (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaEnergy PolicySustainability
In The Last Decade
Guendalina Capece
36 papers receiving 522 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Strategy and Management 131
- Sociology and Political Science 121
- Marketing 116
- Information Systems and Management 101
- Information Systems 89
Countries citing papers authored by Guendalina Capece
This map shows the geographic impact of Guendalina Capece's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guendalina Capece with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guendalina Capece more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Guendalina Capece
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guendalina Capece. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guendalina Capece. The network helps show where Guendalina Capece may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Guendalina Capece
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Guendalina Capece. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Guendalina Capece based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Guendalina Capece. Guendalina Capece is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Guendalina Capece
Guendalina Capece is a scholar working on General Energy, Information Systems and Management and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 40 papers that have together received 556 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Italy: Economic History and Contemporary Issues (6 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (6 papers) and Digital Communication and Language (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Energy (22 citations), Information Systems and Management (101 citations) and Marketing (116 citations). Guendalina Capece has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Sweden and Brunei. Frequent co-authors include Francesca Di Pillo, Roberta Costa, Domenico Campisi, Nathan Levialdi, Armando Calabrese, Livio Cricelli, Francesco Pasquale, Nathan Levialdi Ghiron, Massimo Gastaldi and Michela Miliacca. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Energy Policy and Sustainability.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.