Graham Jackson

508 total citations
17 papers, 300 citations indexed

About

Graham Jackson is a scholar working on Genetics, Law and Toxicology. According to data from OpenAlex, Graham Jackson has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 300 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Genetics, 5 papers in Law and 3 papers in Toxicology. Recurrent topics in Graham Jackson's work include Forensic and Genetic Research (7 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (4 papers) and Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (3 papers). Graham Jackson is often cited by papers focused on Forensic and Genetic Research (7 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (4 papers) and Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (3 papers). Graham Jackson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and New Zealand. Graham Jackson's co-authors include Paul Roberts, John Buckleton, I.W. Evett, Christophe Champod, Charles E.H. Berger, Colin Aitken, Tacha Hicks, Duncan Taylor, Colin Aitken and Alex Biedermann and has published in prestigious journals such as Forensic Science International, Frontiers in Genetics and Genes.

In The Last Decade

Graham Jackson

17 papers receiving 281 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Graham Jackson United Kingdom	10	140	70	53	36	29	17	300
Grayson R. Jackson United Kingdom	5	174 1.2×	77 1.1×	45 0.8×	28 0.8×	38 1.3×	10	376
Simone Gittelson Switzerland	10	128 0.9×	45 0.6×	85 1.6×	19 0.5×	10 0.3×	18	231
Bernard Robertson New Zealand	8	124 0.9×	124 1.8×	19 0.4×	78 2.2×	31 1.1×	25	399
Nicole Egli Switzerland	9	155 1.1×	47 0.7×	14 0.3×	11 0.3×	52 1.8×	15	322
Roberto Puch‐Solis United Kingdom	10	305 2.2×	69 1.0×	147 2.8×	16 0.4×	42 1.4×	24	416
Simon Baechler Switzerland	13	155 1.1×	40 0.6×	89 1.7×	6 0.2×	91 3.1×	29	461
Lindsey A. Foreman United Kingdom	9	237 1.7×	36 0.5×	124 2.3×	12 0.3×	10 0.3×	15	305
Quentin Rossy Switzerland	11	72 0.5×	43 0.6×	16 0.3×	7 0.2×	26 0.9×	28	445
S.S. Kind United Kingdom	11	160 1.1×	21 0.3×	103 1.9×	7 0.2×	25 0.9×	35	374
Klaas Slooten Netherlands	13	362 2.6×	130 1.9×	194 3.7×	10 0.3×	10 0.3×	38	485

Countries citing papers authored by Graham Jackson

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graham Jackson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham Jackson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham Jackson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graham Jackson

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham Jackson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham Jackson. The network helps show where Graham Jackson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Graham Jackson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Graham Jackson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Graham Jackson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Graham Jackson. Graham Jackson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

Maskell, Peter, et al.. (2023). A model of evaluative opinion to encourage greater transparency and justification of interpretation in postmortem forensic toxicology. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 47(7). 563–573. 5 indexed citations

Hicks, Tacha, John Buckleton, Vincent Castella, I.W. Evett, & Graham Jackson. (2022). A Logical Framework for Forensic DNA Interpretation. Genes. 13(6). 957–957. 9 indexed citations

Buckleton, John, Bernard Robertson, James M. Curran, et al.. (2020). A review of likelihood ratios in forensic science based on a critique of Stiffelman “No longer the Gold standard: Probabilistic genotyping is changing the nature of DNA evidence in criminal trials”. Forensic Science International. 310. 110251–110251. 9 indexed citations

Maskell, Peter & Graham Jackson. (2020). Application of a Bayesian network to aid the interpretation of blood alcohol (ethanol) concentrations in air crashes. Forensic Science International. 308. 110174–110174. 3 indexed citations

Maskell, Peter & Graham Jackson. (2020). Presumptive drug testing—The importance of considering prior probabilities. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 2(4). 9 indexed citations

Daéid, Niamh Nic, Alex Biedermann, Christophe Champod, et al.. (2020). The use of Statistics in legal proceedings: A primer for the courts. 2 indexed citations

Jackson, Graham & Alex Biedermann. (2019). “Source” or “Activity” What is the Level of Issue in a Criminal Trial?. Significance. 16(2). 36–39. 8 indexed citations

Gittelson, Simone, Charles E.H. Berger, Graham Jackson, et al.. (2018). A response to “Likelihood ratio as weight of evidence: A closer look” by Lund and Iyer. Forensic Science International. 288. e15–e19. 9 indexed citations

Biedermann, Alex, Christophe Champod, Graham Jackson, et al.. (2016). Evaluation of Forensic DNA Traces When Propositions of Interest Relate to Activities: Analysis and Discussion of Recurrent Concerns. Frontiers in Genetics. 7. 215–215. 42 indexed citations

10.

Neumann, Cédric, et al.. (2016). Presenting Quantitative and Qualitative Information on Forensic Science Evidence in the Courtroom. CHANCE. 29(1). 37–43. 9 indexed citations

11.

Jackson, Graham, et al.. (2015). Communicating the Results of Forensic Science Examinations. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6 indexed citations

12.

Buckleton, John, Jo‐Anne Bright, Duncan Taylor, et al.. (2014). Helping formulate propositions in forensic DNA analysis. Science & Justice. 54(4). 258–261. 23 indexed citations

13.

Jackson, Graham. (2013). The impact of commercialization on the evaluation of DNA evidence. Frontiers in Genetics. 4. 227–227. 7 indexed citations

14.

Jackson, Graham & Sue Black. (2013). Use of data to inform expert evaluative opinion in the comparison of hand images—the importance of scars. International Journal of Legal Medicine. 128(3). 555–563. 14 indexed citations

15.

Berger, Charles E.H., John Buckleton, Christophe Champod, I.W. Evett, & Graham Jackson. (2011). Evidence evaluation: A response to the court of appeal judgment in R v T. Science & Justice. 51(2). 43–49. 73 indexed citations

16.

Aitken, Colin, Paul Roberts, & Graham Jackson. (2010). Fundamentals of probability and statistical evidence in criminal proceedings. 26 indexed citations

17.

Aitken, Colin, Paul Roberts, & Graham Jackson. (2010). Fundamentals of probability and statistical evidence in criminal proceedings: guidance for judges, lawyers, forensic scientists and expert witnesses. Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham). 46 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact