Graham Riches
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Food Science top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 10%
- Topics
- Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (8 papers)Canadian Identity and History (2 papers)Human Rights and Development (2 papers)
In The Last Decade
Graham Riches
20 papers receiving 705 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- General Health Professions 557
- Plant Science 298
- Food Science 149
- Sociology and Political Science 124
- Nutrition and Dietetics 111
Countries citing papers authored by Graham Riches
This map shows the geographic impact of Graham Riches's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham Riches with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham Riches more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Graham Riches
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham Riches. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham Riches. The network helps show where Graham Riches may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Graham Riches
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Graham Riches. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Graham Riches based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Graham Riches. Graham Riches is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | Food Bank Nations: Poverty, Corporate Charity and the Right to Food | 26 |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | First world hunger revisited : food charity or the right to food? | 61 |
| 6 | 82 | |
| 7 | 58 | |
| 8 | 219 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 42 | |
| 11 | Reaffirming the right to food in Canada: the role of community-based food security. | 10 |
| 12 | 75 | |
| 13 | 58 | |
| 14 | 46 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | Labour Market Restructuring and the Public Safety Net: Current Trends in the Australian and Canadian Welfare State | 4 |
| 17 | Winning and Losing at Welfare: Saskatchewan and Canada 1981-1989 | 1 |
| 18 | Community development in Hong Kong : Sau Mau Ping, a case study | 2 |
| 19 | A Process of Community Development? Functions of Community Centres in Hong Kong and Singapore. | 1 |
| 20 | 0 |
About Graham Riches
Graham Riches is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Urban Studies and Public Administration, having authored 23 papers that have together received 810 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (8 papers), Canadian Identity and History (2 papers) and Human Rights and Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (557 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (76 citations) and Food Science (149 citations). Graham Riches has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Tiina Silvasti, Rod MacRae, Karen Rideout, Aleck Ostry, Mustafa Koç, L. J. A. Mougeot and J. Welsh. Their work appears in journals such as Public Health Nutrition, Proceedings of The Nutrition Society and Agriculture and Human Values.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.