Graham E. Trope
About
In The Last Decade
Graham E. Trope
204 papers receiving 4.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
- Ophthalmology 3.6k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.9k
- Molecular Biology 749
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 466
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 421
Countries citing papers authored by Graham E. Trope
This map shows the geographic impact of Graham E. Trope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham E. Trope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham E. Trope more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Graham E. Trope
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham E. Trope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham E. Trope. The network helps show where Graham E. Trope may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Graham E. Trope
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Graham E. Trope. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Graham E. Trope based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Graham E. Trope. Graham E. Trope is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Intra- and inter-hemispheric processing during binocular rivalry in early glaucoma | 1 |
| 4 | Asymmetry of optokinetic nystagmus in early glaucoma | 1 |
| 5 | Visual Field Testing on a Personal Smartphone | 4 |
| 6 | Trends in prevalence of self-reported cataracts in Canada | 1 |
| 7 | Lack of government-funded optometric services is associated with reduced utilization of eye care providers and increased utilization of family doctors | 1 |
| 8 | Low Utilization of Eye Care Providers by Newfoundland and Labrador Seniors: Barriers and Vision Health Outcomes | 1 |
| 9 | Effect of Obesity on Postural Intraocular Pressure Changes | 1 |
| 10 | Structure-Function Relationship between Scanning Laser Tomography, Flicker Defined Form Perimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Patients with Glaucoma | 2 |
| 11 | Structure-Function Relationship using Spectral Domain Ocular Coherence Tomography, Flicker Defined Form Perimetry and Standardized Automated Perimetry in Patients with Glaucoma | 1 |
| 12 | Choroidal Thickness Changes in Response to Acute Increase in Intraocular Pressure | 1 |
| 13 | Unequal Eye Care Utilization in Canada: A Comparison With Dental Care | 1 |
| 14 | Effect of Sleeping Position on Iop in Progressive Glaucoma | 1 |
| 15 | Evaluation of Closing Pressure in Ahmed Glaucoma Valve | 1 |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | Administration Technique And Compliance In Topical Drug Therapy Of Glaucoma | 1 |
| 18 | Can Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation Laser G-probes Be Reused ? | 1 |
| 19 | Determining Ontario's supply and requirements for ophthalmologists in 2000 and 2005: 1. Methods. | 5 |
| 20 | Determining Ontario's supply and requirements for ophthalmologists in 2000 and 2005: 2. A comparison of projected supply and requirements. | 9 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.