Graeme Harper

51 papers receiving 200 citations

Peers

Graeme Harper
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 90
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 66
  • Literature and Literary Theory 61
  • Education 53
  • Sociology and Political Science 44
Replace Judith Hamera with:
Judith Hamera United States
Andrew Ellis Benjamin Bulgaria
Michal M. McCall United States
Victor Burgin United Kingdom
jan jagodzinski Canada
Margaret Iversen United Kingdom
Richard Appignanesi United Kingdom
Nicholas Rowe New Zealand
Janelle Reinelt United States
Evi Ziegler c o EDV Fotowerk Huber Germany
Graeme Harper relative to Judith Hamera United States Judith Hamera's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Judith Hamera · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Graeme Harper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graeme Harper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graeme Harper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graeme Harper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graeme Harper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graeme Harper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graeme Harper. The network helps show where Graeme Harper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Graeme Harper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Graeme Harper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Graeme Harper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Graeme Harper. Graeme Harper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 11
2
The Future of Creative Writing
0
3
Inside creative writing : interviews with contemporary writers
2
4 8
5 1
6 1
7 1
8
Authors at work : the creative environment
3
9
Cinema and Landscape: Film, Nation and Cultural Geography.
7
10 16
11 1
12
The unsilvered screen : surrealism on film
4
13 30
14
Signs of life : cinema and medicine
16
15
Signs of life: medicine and cinema
3
16 2
17 1
18
Comedy, fantasy and colonialism
13
19
Enfranchising the Child: Picture Books, Primacy, and Discourse
5
20
Colonial and postcolonial incarceration
11

About Graeme Harper

Graeme Harper is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Urban Studies and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 63 papers that have together received 259 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Artistic and Creative Research (22 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (13 papers) and Cultural Industries and Urban Development (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (90 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (61 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (66 citations). Graeme Harper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Diane Seddon, David Forrest, Randy Cohen, Donna Lee Brien, Scott Barry Kaufman and James C. Kaufman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Contemporary European Studies, Quality in Ageing and Older Adults and Creative Industries Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026