Graeme Dean
- Accounting top 5%
- Management Information Systems top 5%
- Strategy and Management
- Economics and Econometrics
- Public Administration top 10%
- Co-authors
- Frank ClarkeRobyn PilcherJohn Richard EdwardsPeter W. WolnizerGünther GebhardtFrancesco CapalboKen V. PeasnellSandra van der Laan
- Topics
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (16 papers)Accounting and Organizational Management (14 papers)Accounting Education and Careers (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomSlovenia
In The Last Decade
Graeme Dean
40 papers receiving 270 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Accounting 194
- Management Information Systems 162
- Strategy and Management 53
- Economics and Econometrics 45
- Public Administration 27
Countries citing papers authored by Graeme Dean
This map shows the geographic impact of Graeme Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graeme Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graeme Dean more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Graeme Dean
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graeme Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graeme Dean. The network helps show where Graeme Dean may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Graeme Dean
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Graeme Dean. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Graeme Dean based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Graeme Dean. Graeme Dean is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | Indecent Disclosure: Gilding the Corporate Lily | 3 |
| 5 | The Unaccountable & Ungovernable Corporation: Companies' use-by-dates close in | 1 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 42 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | Chambers on Accounting: Logic, Law and Ethics | 2 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Graeme Dean
Graeme Dean is a scholar working on Accounting, Management Information Systems and Public Administration, having authored 45 papers that have together received 292 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (16 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (14 papers) and Accounting Education and Careers (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (162 citations), Accounting (194 citations) and Public Administration (27 citations). Graeme Dean has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Frank Clarke, Robyn Pilcher, John Richard Edwards, Peter W. Wolnizer, Günther Gebhardt, Francesco Capalbo, Ken V. Peasnell, Sandra van der Laan, Michael E. Bradbury and Matthew Egan. Their work appears in journals such as Accounting Organizations and Society, Accounting Horizons and European Accounting Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.