Görel Hansebo
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Mona KihlgrenBritt‐Marie TernestedtAnna BjörkdahlTom PalmstiernaIngrid HellströmAstrid NorbergJane ÖsterlindCatharina Frank
- Topics
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (15 papers)Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (14 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwedenUnited StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Görel Hansebo
29 papers receiving 760 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- General Health Professions 468
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 247
- Clinical Psychology 223
- Psychiatry and Mental health 181
- Sociology and Political Science 134
Countries citing papers authored by Görel Hansebo
This map shows the geographic impact of Görel Hansebo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Görel Hansebo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Görel Hansebo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Görel Hansebo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Görel Hansebo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Görel Hansebo. The network helps show where Görel Hansebo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Görel Hansebo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Görel Hansebo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Görel Hansebo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Görel Hansebo. Görel Hansebo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 59 | |
| 2 | 24 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 52 | |
| 7 | 41 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 63 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 41 | |
| 17 | 71 | |
| 18 | 42 | |
| 19 | 31 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Görel Hansebo
Görel Hansebo is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and General Health Professions, having authored 29 papers that have together received 805 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (15 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (14 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (34 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (45 citations) and General Health Professions (468 citations). Görel Hansebo has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Mona Kihlgren, Britt‐Marie Ternestedt, Anna Björkdahl, Tom Palmstierna, Ingrid Hellström, Astrid Norberg, Jane Österlind, Catharina Frank, Ania Willman and Per‐Olof Sandman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Clinical Nursing and Health Policy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.