Gonçalo da Costa
- Molecular Biology
- Physiology top 10%
- Animal Science and Zoology top 5%
- Plant Science
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ana Varela CoelhoCarlos CordeiroElsa LamyFernando Capela e SilvaElvira Sales-BaptistaRomana SantosFederico DajasCatarina Franco
- Topics
- Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions (6 papers)Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes (6 papers)Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- PortugalUruguayNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Gonçalo da Costa
41 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Molecular Biology 403
- Physiology 239
- Animal Science and Zoology 154
- Plant Science 130
- Nutrition and Dietetics 127
Countries citing papers authored by Gonçalo da Costa
This map shows the geographic impact of Gonçalo da Costa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gonçalo da Costa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gonçalo da Costa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gonçalo da Costa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gonçalo da Costa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gonçalo da Costa. The network helps show where Gonçalo da Costa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gonçalo da Costa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gonçalo da Costa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gonçalo da Costa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gonçalo da Costa. Gonçalo da Costa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 28 | |
| 5 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 41 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 44 | |
| 15 | 34 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 46 | |
| 18 | 56 | |
| 19 | 67 | |
| 20 | Effects of cannabis resin on learning by repetition in the rat. | 1 |
About Gonçalo da Costa
Gonçalo da Costa is a scholar working on Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, Nutrition and Dietetics and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions (6 papers), Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes (6 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (154 citations), Sensory Systems (55 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (70 citations). Gonçalo da Costa has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Uruguay and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ana Varela Coelho, Carlos Cordeiro, Elsa Lamy, Fernando Capela e Silva, Elvira Sales-Baptista, Romana Santos, Federico Dajas, Catarina Franco, Carolina Echeverry and Juan Andrés Abin‐Carriquiry. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Biochemical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.